10 Impact Investing Strategies

Impact investing has moved from the fringe toward the mainstream, but individual investors still have many moving parts and challenges to consider.

If you’re committed to impact as well as wanting to protect your financial future, you can attain various levels of financial return together with the generation of social and environmental impacts. And you can direct your resources toward not only providing for your own future, but the future of your children and community. Here are ten actions investors can take to help mobilize an impact investing strategy with confidence, from The ImpactAssets Handbook for Investors.

If you like this, subscribe here for more stories that Inspire The Future.

1. Fortune Favors the Prepared Mind

Good investing involves some level of luck—that the markets move up with you; that you select the right managers at the right time and so on—but the fact is good preparation can help you increase the odds you’ve made the right decisions at the right times for the right reasons. Rather than attempting to “time the market” looking to take advantage of short term ups and downs, remember to stay focused on your long term goals and plan for those goals through creating a sound strategy.

2. Impact Investing is Additive – Not Restrictive

Impact investing is about taking traditional, sober and conservative fundamental investing practice and augmenting it with considerations of social and environmental impact. At its best, it is taking what works about traditional investment practice and integrating it with considerations of “off balance sheet” risk and opportunity that may be identified by considering social and environmental factors that could effect your investment. And a good impact investing strategy may also include looking for opportunities to invest that optimize positive impacts for your community and our world.

3. Impact Investing is a Lens – Not an Asset Class

Impact investing is, simply put, a lens through which one approaches the full spectrum of options and asset classes in the market and for one’s portfolio. Therefore, impact investing is not an asset class; mistaking it for one does a disservice to the investor who may then be forced to compartmentalize the application of best practice. Rather, we should seek to let its practices and our pursuit of it flourish across the full spectrum of portfolio opportunities before us.

4. Define Your Process and Commit to Your Plan

Building upon investment practices of the mainstream, adhering to your plan while executing it in a flexible manner as you proceed, you will be able to responsibly manage your investment process and improve the possibilities of success.

5. Understand What Risk Means for You – Not the Investor Next to You!’

You may want to live on the edge or you may want to stick closer to the wall, but either way you alone must decide what is reasonable and what is the best approach for you. Listen to what other impact investors are talking about, understand how others are approaching their investment process—but never forget your goals, your level of risk and that your strategy is about what you want to do, not what others are promoting.

6. Impact Investing is an Evolving Field – Grow with It

This is the brave new world, be part of it along the way. Activated investors approaching impact across the full spectrum of their portfolio, demanding excellence and sustained value from the funds and companies they invest in, are well positioned to both benefit from and help in the creation of greater depth in the field of impact investing.

7. Start with What You Know And Learn – What You Need to Know

We have found that the ‘personal’ translates well as an onramp into impact investing. What do you care about? Why are you specifically motivated to approach impact investing? Is there a particular impact theme you have experienced or that has touched your life as an issue? Or is it a family member who is pushing you to engage in exploring it? Use the answers to those questions to help focus your approach.

8. If You Don’t Understand What The Investment Strategy Is – Don’t Invest!

Impact doesn’t trump a good business model, just as a good business idea is often less important than a good management team. If you can’t understand the fundamentals of why an investment is impactful, how it will make money and find its market, and which excellent people are going to be at the wheel… you shouldn’t invest!

9. Invest for Long Term Not Short Term Returns (both Financial and Impact)

Value is well correlated to patience and the pursuit of long term strategies. This applies to both impact and financial value creation for the investor and the world. Invest for the long term, but get going with a healthy dose of impatience in terms of putting the trains on the tracks of integrating impact as broadly as possible in your portfolio.

A dollar far off in the future is much less certain or more risky, with its buying power eroded by accumulating inflation. We should approach the time value of impact from a similar perspective. Positive impact is far more valuable now than later. The best fund managers and companies will increasingly deliver these to investors, if and as they understand them to be a “must have” requirement.

10. Don’t Judge a Book by Its Cover

As you explore the growing array of offerings before you, don’t get too wrapped up in whether or not something is called “impact.” What matters is not what someone says, but rather how an investment strategy is managed, what types of companies they actually invest in, the degree of intentionally and depth to their approach and your ability to assess the types of extra-financial, social and environmental value any given strategy advances. Remember: some folks who claim positive impact, don’t generate it and some who have never heard the word are actually creating real, sustainable value. Assess all those who claim to “do” impact investing and you be the judge of what they do—not what they say!

If you like this, subscribe here for more stories that Inspire The Future.

 

10 Impact Investing Strategies

Impact investing has moved from the fringe toward the mainstream, but individual investors still have many moving parts and challenges to consider.

If you’re committed to impact as well as wanting to protect your financial future, you can attain various levels of financial return together with the generation of social and environmental impacts. And you can direct your resources toward not only providing for your own future, but the future of your children and community. Here are ten actions investors can take to help mobilize an impact investing strategy with confidence, from The ImpactAssets Handbook for Investors.

If you like this, subscribe here for more stories that Inspire The Future.

1. Fortune Favors the Prepared Mind

Good investing involves some level of luck—that the markets move up with you; that you select the right managers at the right time and so on—but the fact is good preparation can help you increase the odds you’ve made the right decisions at the right times for the right reasons. Rather than attempting to “time the market” looking to take advantage of short term ups and downs, remember to stay focused on your long term goals and plan for those goals through creating a sound strategy.

2. Impact Investing is Additive – Not Restrictive

Impact investing is about taking traditional, sober and conservative fundamental investing practice and augmenting it with considerations of social and environmental impact. At its best, it is taking what works about traditional investment practice and integrating it with considerations of “off balance sheet” risk and opportunity that may be identified by considering social and environmental factors that could effect your investment. And a good impact investing strategy may also include looking for opportunities to invest that optimize positive impacts for your community and our world.

3. Impact Investing is a Lens – Not an Asset Class

Impact investing is, simply put, a lens through which one approaches the full spectrum of options and asset classes in the market and for one’s portfolio. Therefore, impact investing is not an asset class; mistaking it for one does a disservice to the investor who may then be forced to compartmentalize the application of best practice. Rather, we should seek to let its practices and our pursuit of it flourish across the full spectrum of portfolio opportunities before us.

4. Define Your Process and Commit to Your Plan

Building upon investment practices of the mainstream, adhering to your plan while executing it in a flexible manner as you proceed, you will be able to responsibly manage your investment process and improve the possibilities of success.

5. Understand What Risk Means for You – Not the Investor Next to You!’

You may want to live on the edge or you may want to stick closer to the wall, but either way you alone must decide what is reasonable and what is the best approach for you. Listen to what other impact investors are talking about, understand how others are approaching their investment process—but never forget your goals, your level of risk and that your strategy is about what you want to do, not what others are promoting.

6. Impact Investing is an Evolving Field – Grow with It

This is the brave new world, be part of it along the way. Activated investors approaching impact across the full spectrum of their portfolio, demanding excellence and sustained value from the funds and companies they invest in, are well positioned to both benefit from and help in the creation of greater depth in the field of impact investing.

7. Start with What You Know And Learn – What You Need to Know

We have found that the ‘personal’ translates well as an onramp into impact investing. What do you care about? Why are you specifically motivated to approach impact investing? Is there a particular impact theme you have experienced or that has touched your life as an issue? Or is it a family member who is pushing you to engage in exploring it? Use the answers to those questions to help focus your approach.

8. If You Don’t Understand What The Investment Strategy Is – Don’t Invest!

Impact doesn’t trump a good business model, just as a good business idea is often less important than a good management team. If you can’t understand the fundamentals of why an investment is impactful, how it will make money and find its market, and which excellent people are going to be at the wheel… you shouldn’t invest!

9. Invest for Long Term Not Short Term Returns (both Financial and Impact)

Value is well correlated to patience and the pursuit of long term strategies. This applies to both impact and financial value creation for the investor and the world. Invest for the long term, but get going with a healthy dose of impatience in terms of putting the trains on the tracks of integrating impact as broadly as possible in your portfolio.

A dollar far off in the future is much less certain or more risky, with its buying power eroded by accumulating inflation. We should approach the time value of impact from a similar perspective. Positive impact is far more valuable now than later. The best fund managers and companies will increasingly deliver these to investors, if and as they understand them to be a “must have” requirement.

10. Don’t Judge a Book by Its Cover

As you explore the growing array of offerings before you, don’t get too wrapped up in whether or not something is called “impact.” What matters is not what someone says, but rather how an investment strategy is managed, what types of companies they actually invest in, the degree of intentionally and depth to their approach and your ability to assess the types of extra-financial, social and environmental value any given strategy advances. Remember: some folks who claim positive impact, don’t generate it and some who have never heard the word are actually creating real, sustainable value. Assess all those who claim to “do” impact investing and you be the judge of what they do—not what they say!

If you like this, subscribe here for more stories that Inspire The Future.

 

Farm Grows ‘Organic’ Returns for Impact Investors

It’s tough to find a better example of environmental stewardship and sustainable use than organic farming.

Indeed, the responsible growth of food that sustains us is pretty much the ideal picture of what the impact investing ethos is, and aims to be. With only an estimated 1 percent of farmland in the United States certified as organic, it’s an area ripe for growth.

For Iroquois Valley Farms, a restorative farmland finance company founded in 2007, that growth will be fueled in large part by next-generation farmers. As the nation’s first organic, family farmer focused Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), Iroquois Valley is enabling the millennial generation to invest directly in healthy, organic food production. The firm, which has $50 million in organic farmland investments, has appreciated 10 percent per year since inception.

Speciality grains growing at Vilicus Farms in the Great Plains region of Montana. Vilicus Farms specializes in small and ancient grains, legumes, oilseeds, and more, while also focusing on conservation and native habitat preservation. Iroquois Valley Farms works with farmers in 13 states from Maine to Montana.

It’s a long way from the firm’s beginnings just prior to the mortgage-fueled Great Recession. At that time, Co-founder and CEO David Miller came in possession of a 10-acre piece of family property, which he transitioned to an organic farm. At the same time, Dr. Stephen Rivard, Miller’s college roommate, was observing the effects of the overexposure to herbicides and pesticides on agriculture workers

If you like this, subscribe here for more stories that Inspire The Future.

“Dr. Steve, as I call him, and I got together and thought, ‘Why don’t we enable, effectively, the next generation of farmers to do it differently?’” Miller says. “My background is in corporate and real estate finance, so this is just a natural for me.”

The duo, along with 10 friends and family members, formed Iroquois Valley Farms, LLC. It’s a “farmer-centric business model,” meaning the farmers bring opportunities to Iroquois, not the other way around.

“We never go out and buy land and then try to find a farmer,” he explains. “That’s a non-scalable approach to being in business. Farmers bring us the opportunity, and we buy it and lease it to the farmer, with a goal of the famer having eventual ownership.”

An important point Miller emphasizes is the firm’s distinction from traditional private equity models, particularly in the way it ramps up.

Using the term “slower than slow money,” he saw the mistakes too many funds made by deploying too quickly (it was 2007, after all), lessons learned that remain today. Rather than raising “$100 million or $200 million” and immediately investing, they take their time, and for good reason.

“It’s hard to move too fast in organic farming, but if you try you usually make bigger mistakes,” he claims. “This is not a turnkey type business where you can just buy some land, shake hands with the farmer, come back in 10 years and sell it to pay everybody off. That’s a complete mismatch with what the farmers want to do. They want the land for the rest of their life, so from the get-go, we knew that we had to go nontraditional.”

In addition to “growing” slower with its committed capital, the firm is willing to work with individuals.

“Most of the funds you see starting up here or there, they start big and they start fast, and it’s mostly institutional capital. We connect with individual investors and individual farmers. Even though, right now, they’re all accredited investors, they can use their IRA accounts or family trusts. IRAs are long-term investment vehicles that fit with the time horizons of our model.”

The long-term horizon of the investment and the risky nature of the underlying business farming means Miller and his partners at Iroquois have to be innovative.

Main Street Project is the first nonprofit Iroquois Valley Farms financed. The Minnesota-based organization trains Latino immigrants in their poultry-centered permaculture model to create social, environmental, and food system change.

“We diversify everything,” he says. “We diversify our capital base, we diversify our farmers, we diversify our lenders. And a few years ago, we decided to go to our investors and borrow money from them. We offered 5- and 7-year term notes, which we billed as ‘Young Farmer Land Access Notes.’ And they were very successful and very desired by financial advisors for their clients.”

That success led to offerings of shorter-term notes, with the intention of bringing down the costs associated with a 3-year transition to Certified Organic status, traditionally the most difficult period for farmers. They called it a Soil Restoration Note, “because those first few years are all about restoring the soil.”

A certified B Corporation, Iroquois is also an investment option for donors to the ImpactAssets Giving Fund (a donor advised fund) and is included in the ImpactAssets 50, a resource that provides investors and financial advisors with detailed information about 50 of the most experienced impact investment firms and potential investment options.

Iroquois continues to innovate, forming the REIT earlier this year because “we’re moving toward offering our stock and our notes to non-accredited investors,” said Miller. “We care about social values. We believe it’s important to engage the next generation, so they can invest in this change. To confine ourselves only to accredited investors would be unfair.”

If you like this, subscribe here for more stories that Inspire The Future.

 

Impact Investing for the 99%: A New Path to Mainstreaming

All investments have impact. But to-date, impact investing has been largely limited to small, private companies, and accessible only to accredited investors.

What if it were possible for normal folks to easily allocate their retirement portfolios in such a way that maximized the impact of their investments on issues they care about – e.g. climate change, gun control, gender diversity, etc? Such an innovation would unlock vast amounts of capital and consciousness, catalyzing the true mainstreaming of impact investing.

Individual investors are currently being left out of powerful movement. In public equities, over US $1 Trillion has moved into Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) strategies annually over the last 5 years [1]. Yet only a small fraction appears to be owned by retail investors. This despite the fact that according to Morgan Stanley, over 70% of individual investors now say they want their money to align with their values [2]. Given this chasm in even the most liquid and marketable asset classes, small wonder that impact investors have focused instead on getting big checks from Limited Partners (LPs).

But this “missing retail” segment – the amount of SRI assets individuals should hold if responsible investing had the same proportional ownership structure as the normal stock market – represents an approximate $3.6 Trillion opportunity in the U.S. alone.

Here’s how we can close the gap:
The first blockage to mainstreaming is lack of awareness. Most financial intermediaries have stood as a roadblock, with some statistics saying fewer than 10% of advisors, for example, are highly interested in sustainable investing solutions [3]. There is certainly no shortage of sustainable fund options and other tools for investors to start driving change. But the incentives of the Wall Street food chain generally militate against transparency and customization. Rather, they promote a “leave it to the experts” mentality, so that they can continue to sell preset portfolios that protect their margins.

Fortunately, technology makes it possible to dis-intermediate agents who are standing in the way, and to customize portfolios that invest in companies whose impact is consistent with each person’s values. This is our approach at OpenInvest. By bypassing the entire “fund” model and algorithmically constructing each user’s portfolio, investing once again becomes personal, transparent, and impactful. Users can now fully customize their investment portfolios and retirement accounts to support the things they care about.

But this is just the beginning. By vertically integrating and replacing middlemen with computing power, individual investors can now take new actions any time they want – in response to real-world events – while their portfolios always stay balanced and tracking the market. They can have full transparency into what they own, they can vote in their own shareholder resolutions, and they can see rigorous reporting of their real-time social and environmental impacts.

To mainstream, we need to make responsible investing easy, visceral, and social. That requires advanced technology, but then translating that technology into user experience. We can’t claim to have fully cracked that nut, but we’re making sufficient strides. OpenInvest has experienced nearly 20% week-over-week growth since our launch at SOCAP16 in September. It’s clear that the demand for impact investing is real and all around us.

Innovating in public equities is the obvious first step to engaging individual, unaccredited investors. But it’s also the way to build a sufficient demand pipeline to incentivize the impact investing community to open up. Starting this year, we will begin swapping out pieces of portfolios with alternative, impact investing products that we know users care about.

There are already impact products in the retail market – from new crowdfunding equity platforms to Calvert Community Notes. But for the motivated individuals who buy these, what does it mean for their diversification? Are you overweight solar, Indonesia, your local community? We believe the key to liberating unaccredited impact investors is to start from the top-down, with a fully balanced responsible portfolio. We can then offer to replace slices with deeper impact products, while always maintaining portfolio-level diversification. As such, we welcome partners from the SOCAP community to help get products onto our platform for our growing base.

To be clear: retail investors of the future will enjoy similar performance and diversification as their parents. But their holdings will cut across impact asset classes, as they see and feel where their money is going and how they are shaping the world every day.

Following Trump’s election and his subsequent actions, there’s more demand than ever to find new channels to drive change. Yet while they picket in the streets and write monologues on Facebook, individuals are letting their most powerful weapon – their assets – collect dust. The key is to start by giving public markets back to the public. Then we can create a pipeline of capital to help scale impact investing, while in turn restructuring personal portfolios to truly engage our communities and the world. Through a combination of technology and psychology, we now have the tools to democratize capital. Let’s cross that tipping point together.

Impact Investing for the 99%: A New Path to Mainstreaming

All investments have impact. But to-date, impact investing has been largely limited to small, private companies, and accessible only to accredited investors.

What if it were possible for normal folks to easily allocate their retirement portfolios in such a way that maximized the impact of their investments on issues they care about – e.g. climate change, gun control, gender diversity, etc? Such an innovation would unlock vast amounts of capital and consciousness, catalyzing the true mainstreaming of impact investing.

Individual investors are currently being left out of powerful movement. In public equities, over US $1 Trillion has moved into Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) strategies annually over the last 5 years [1]. Yet only a small fraction appears to be owned by retail investors. This despite the fact that according to Morgan Stanley, over 70% of individual investors now say they want their money to align with their values [2]. Given this chasm in even the most liquid and marketable asset classes, small wonder that impact investors have focused instead on getting big checks from Limited Partners (LPs).

But this “missing retail” segment – the amount of SRI assets individuals should hold if responsible investing had the same proportional ownership structure as the normal stock market – represents an approximate $3.6 Trillion opportunity in the U.S. alone.

Here’s how we can close the gap:
The first blockage to mainstreaming is lack of awareness. Most financial intermediaries have stood as a roadblock, with some statistics saying fewer than 10% of advisors, for example, are highly interested in sustainable investing solutions [3]. There is certainly no shortage of sustainable fund options and other tools for investors to start driving change. But the incentives of the Wall Street food chain generally militate against transparency and customization. Rather, they promote a “leave it to the experts” mentality, so that they can continue to sell preset portfolios that protect their margins.

Fortunately, technology makes it possible to dis-intermediate agents who are standing in the way, and to customize portfolios that invest in companies whose impact is consistent with each person’s values. This is our approach at OpenInvest. By bypassing the entire “fund” model and algorithmically constructing each user’s portfolio, investing once again becomes personal, transparent, and impactful. Users can now fully customize their investment portfolios and retirement accounts to support the things they care about.

But this is just the beginning. By vertically integrating and replacing middlemen with computing power, individual investors can now take new actions any time they want – in response to real-world events – while their portfolios always stay balanced and tracking the market. They can have full transparency into what they own, they can vote in their own shareholder resolutions, and they can see rigorous reporting of their real-time social and environmental impacts.

To mainstream, we need to make responsible investing easy, visceral, and social. That requires advanced technology, but then translating that technology into user experience. We can’t claim to have fully cracked that nut, but we’re making sufficient strides. OpenInvest has experienced nearly 20% week-over-week growth since our launch at SOCAP16 in September. It’s clear that the demand for impact investing is real and all around us.

Innovating in public equities is the obvious first step to engaging individual, unaccredited investors. But it’s also the way to build a sufficient demand pipeline to incentivize the impact investing community to open up. Starting this year, we will begin swapping out pieces of portfolios with alternative, impact investing products that we know users care about.

There are already impact products in the retail market – from new crowdfunding equity platforms to Calvert Community Notes. But for the motivated individuals who buy these, what does it mean for their diversification? Are you overweight solar, Indonesia, your local community? We believe the key to liberating unaccredited impact investors is to start from the top-down, with a fully balanced responsible portfolio. We can then offer to replace slices with deeper impact products, while always maintaining portfolio-level diversification. As such, we welcome partners from the SOCAP community to help get products onto our platform for our growing base.

To be clear: retail investors of the future will enjoy similar performance and diversification as their parents. But their holdings will cut across impact asset classes, as they see and feel where their money is going and how they are shaping the world every day.

Following Trump’s election and his subsequent actions, there’s more demand than ever to find new channels to drive change. Yet while they picket in the streets and write monologues on Facebook, individuals are letting their most powerful weapon – their assets – collect dust. The key is to start by giving public markets back to the public. Then we can create a pipeline of capital to help scale impact investing, while in turn restructuring personal portfolios to truly engage our communities and the world. Through a combination of technology and psychology, we now have the tools to democratize capital. Let’s cross that tipping point together.

Impact Investing Goes Mainstream

“You cannot separate people from the environment,” says Michael Van Patten, former Mission Markets CEO and current Founder of ethical investment tech company my4. His new company is a marketplace for investors within the impact and sustainability sector looking for a way to align their personal values with their investments. He shared his views on impact investing with us.

“We’re trying to create an infrastructure where  investment can more effectively access these type of opportunities and support the growing global movement of people looking for returns on investment, while also making sure their dollars are going to a tangible social benefit,” says Van Patten.

This way of thinking may not apply to every aspect of an investors portfolio, but clearly they are starting to identify a percentage of their portfolio for this. “We’re creating an infrastructure that integrates existing financial measurement tools that have started giving information on social enterprise or environmental projects. We’re also measuring the impacts above and beyond the financial benefits an investor might receive.”

“Most people look at  impact asset markets and treat them differently,” says Van Patten. “Yes, they are different, but you need to speak to traditional investors in their own language. The impact assets market is still small compared to traditional markets, and the world doesn’t really fully understand them yet.

To become effective worldwide, and to ultimately change the way we do business, we need to put this in a format that investment advisors, brokers and other gatekeepers of wealth understand.”

“From this sector you’re going to see the next generation of major corporations emerge, the future Fortune 500 companies.”

At the very least, these gatekeepers should be educated enough to be able to respond intelligently to the growing number of requests that are arising from investors wanting to enter these markets. Van Patten doesn’t treat impact investing as a niche market but as a mainstream one. “The obstacles we face are that many organizations seeking capital are small, not well-known and are still in their formative years.

Large established companies giving regular and predictable returns doesn’t exist yet. The benchmark tools an investor might use when reviewing a company’s performance, such as the risk and return over ten years, is not available yet, as this industry is still too young.

“One of the biggest obstacles is that investment-seeking companies tend to be private and in the U.S. you have to raise capital in a private placement that is only available to accredited investors. These types of investment opportunities are only available legally to someone who has a lot of money. Anyone who doesn’t qualify as an accredited investor cannot even begin to look at these opportunities. That’s a big roadblock, and we’re trying to change it.

“On returns, it really depends on how you view ‘return’. Historically, these investment opportunities have been in the form of debt or a form of debt and equity, and typically the returns were not as high as traditional markets. But now all that’s changing. 

“Whatever you call this sector, it can only grow. From this sector you’re going to see the next generation of major corporations emerge, the future Fortune 500 companies. Before this happens you’ll see a lot of them struggle because we’re still in infancy .”

In the future, Van Patten says that products and services seeking this kind of investment will have to be transparent in their social and environmental footprints. “The future of finance is going to have to incorporate these two externalities as part of the new way of doing business,” he says. “How this will be incorporated into a companies balance-sheet is yet to be seen, but the writing is on the wall.

Major corporations are now part of working groups, established to create transparency in the social and environmental footprint of companies. For example, companies such as Levi Strauss, Gap, Walmart, Patagonia and Timberland are now placing information on their clothing or food that allows you to rate the environmental footprint of that product.

As well as the obvious good this creates for the planet, it’s also clever marketing. They manage to distinguish themselves from competitors, but most importantly it creates an opportunity for those companies that aren’t onboard to start losing market share.” Whether companies reveal their responsible behavior in an investor report, annual report, product labels or as part of their service, this fact is going to drive consumer and investor demand in the future,” says Van Patten.

“Presently, the market is clearly not favoring a company that is sustainable, it is just not being priced into a company’s stock. Eventually these issues are going to become evident in company annual reports, and it will begin to affect that company. For example, a company that pollutes will be exposed, and its stock will be effected adversely – not only by consumers refusing to buy their goods, but also from giant corporations, with good governance, who might cut them from their supply chain.

Companies should not make the mistake of focusing solely on consumer sentiment, but also on business-to-business transactions. “If an investor knows that a company he’s invested in is already thinking ahead and initiating business models on how to become more sustainable and transparent, then that shows a management team that’s already on its toes and focusing on the next big thing.

If they’re not, then you need to question whether that company, and management, is actually seeing the change happening in the world right now. If you ‘get it’ as a company, then you acknowledge your actions have global implications and you implement that as a business process.

When this becomes more recognized, you’ll see the stock prices of these companies rise and carry a premium as it reflects on how innovative and forward-thinking management is. To do this you need vision and belief in what you’re doing.

Be bold, even when a market that may not yet ‘be there.’ Your ideas need to cater for where the market is right now, and at the same time, actively shift towards where you aim to be.”

 

Impact Investing Goes Mainstream

“You cannot separate people from the environment,” says Michael Van Patten, former Mission Markets CEO and current Founder of ethical investment tech company my4. His new company is a marketplace for investors within the impact and sustainability sector looking for a way to align their personal values with their investments. He shared his views on impact investing with us.

“We’re trying to create an infrastructure where  investment can more effectively access these type of opportunities and support the growing global movement of people looking for returns on investment, while also making sure their dollars are going to a tangible social benefit,” says Van Patten.

This way of thinking may not apply to every aspect of an investors portfolio, but clearly they are starting to identify a percentage of their portfolio for this. “We’re creating an infrastructure that integrates existing financial measurement tools that have started giving information on social enterprise or environmental projects. We’re also measuring the impacts above and beyond the financial benefits an investor might receive.”

“Most people look at  impact asset markets and treat them differently,” says Van Patten. “Yes, they are different, but you need to speak to traditional investors in their own language. The impact assets market is still small compared to traditional markets, and the world doesn’t really fully understand them yet.

To become effective worldwide, and to ultimately change the way we do business, we need to put this in a format that investment advisors, brokers and other gatekeepers of wealth understand.”

“From this sector you’re going to see the next generation of major corporations emerge, the future Fortune 500 companies.”

At the very least, these gatekeepers should be educated enough to be able to respond intelligently to the growing number of requests that are arising from investors wanting to enter these markets. Van Patten doesn’t treat impact investing as a niche market but as a mainstream one. “The obstacles we face are that many organizations seeking capital are small, not well-known and are still in their formative years.

Large established companies giving regular and predictable returns doesn’t exist yet. The benchmark tools an investor might use when reviewing a company’s performance, such as the risk and return over ten years, is not available yet, as this industry is still too young.

“One of the biggest obstacles is that investment-seeking companies tend to be private and in the U.S. you have to raise capital in a private placement that is only available to accredited investors. These types of investment opportunities are only available legally to someone who has a lot of money. Anyone who doesn’t qualify as an accredited investor cannot even begin to look at these opportunities. That’s a big roadblock, and we’re trying to change it.

“On returns, it really depends on how you view ‘return’. Historically, these investment opportunities have been in the form of debt or a form of debt and equity, and typically the returns were not as high as traditional markets. But now all that’s changing. 

“Whatever you call this sector, it can only grow. From this sector you’re going to see the next generation of major corporations emerge, the future Fortune 500 companies. Before this happens you’ll see a lot of them struggle because we’re still in infancy .”

In the future, Van Patten says that products and services seeking this kind of investment will have to be transparent in their social and environmental footprints. “The future of finance is going to have to incorporate these two externalities as part of the new way of doing business,” he says. “How this will be incorporated into a companies balance-sheet is yet to be seen, but the writing is on the wall.

Major corporations are now part of working groups, established to create transparency in the social and environmental footprint of companies. For example, companies such as Levi Strauss, Gap, Walmart, Patagonia and Timberland are now placing information on their clothing or food that allows you to rate the environmental footprint of that product.

As well as the obvious good this creates for the planet, it’s also clever marketing. They manage to distinguish themselves from competitors, but most importantly it creates an opportunity for those companies that aren’t onboard to start losing market share.” Whether companies reveal their responsible behavior in an investor report, annual report, product labels or as part of their service, this fact is going to drive consumer and investor demand in the future,” says Van Patten.

“Presently, the market is clearly not favoring a company that is sustainable, it is just not being priced into a company’s stock. Eventually these issues are going to become evident in company annual reports, and it will begin to affect that company. For example, a company that pollutes will be exposed, and its stock will be effected adversely – not only by consumers refusing to buy their goods, but also from giant corporations, with good governance, who might cut them from their supply chain.

Companies should not make the mistake of focusing solely on consumer sentiment, but also on business-to-business transactions. “If an investor knows that a company he’s invested in is already thinking ahead and initiating business models on how to become more sustainable and transparent, then that shows a management team that’s already on its toes and focusing on the next big thing.

If they’re not, then you need to question whether that company, and management, is actually seeing the change happening in the world right now. If you ‘get it’ as a company, then you acknowledge your actions have global implications and you implement that as a business process.

When this becomes more recognized, you’ll see the stock prices of these companies rise and carry a premium as it reflects on how innovative and forward-thinking management is. To do this you need vision and belief in what you’re doing.

Be bold, even when a market that may not yet ‘be there.’ Your ideas need to cater for where the market is right now, and at the same time, actively shift towards where you aim to be.”

 

Making Impact Investible

Download this free report by Dr. Maximilian Martin of Impact Economy, Switzerland which aims to strengthen the impact investing industry. A culmination of three years work, the report discusses how all parties involved — from foundations to angel investors to financial service institutions — can contribute to and benefit from the growing impact investing industry.

It includes a series of recommendations to strengthen the industry and highlights the need for increased transparency and better measurement systems. Download the report here: Impact Economy 2013

Making Impact Investible

Download this free report by Dr. Maximilian Martin of Impact Economy, Switzerland which aims to strengthen the impact investing industry. A culmination of three years work, the report discusses how all parties involved — from foundations to angel investors to financial service institutions — can contribute to and benefit from the growing impact investing industry.

It includes a series of recommendations to strengthen the industry and highlights the need for increased transparency and better measurement systems. Download the report here: Impact Economy 2013

People, Planet, Profits

We need leaders to come up with ridiculous ideas and impossible solutions, says Mark Van Ness, the founder of an innovative real estate company.

We need, Mark Van Ness believes, greater synergy between people, planet and profit, and it is clear old ideas are simply not working. He’s in good company as a recent Harvard Business Journal and the book Megatrends 2010 share this view.

The world has reached what Malcolm Gladwell would call a ‘tipping point’ in many areas. There is the global financial crisis, the rapid melting of polar caps, increasing rates of cancer at earlier ages and politicians globally who seem frozen by a paucity of new ideas. A tipping point, in case you never read Gladwell’s best-selling book, is an epidemiological term “given to that moment in an epidemic when a virus reaches critical mass. It’s the boiling point. It’s the moment on the graph when the line starts to shoot straight upwards.”

It’s the moment when what has always worked develops terminal failure syndrome.

It’s early in the morning, and property tycoon and social entrepreneur, Mark Van Ness is sitting talking, he is wearing a casual jersey and his hair is slightly ruffled. When he feels an idea is important, he leans forward and frowns slightly. As he is now. “When I was growing up I was exposed to silly ideas. I remember my father coming home for dinner; he said he had a meeting with someone who said they were replacing cash with blue plastic cards. At the time everything was either cash or check.

You should have heard the laughter at the dinner table. My mother said there is no way I will have a card with my money in it, it is absurd. Within 10 years it went from being a silly idea to the norm.” He gives another example. “My school did a field trip to my dad’s data-processing company, and a kid asked, can you program a computer to play chess? He said, technically you could if you had enough money and time, but there is no building in the world large enough to house such a computer.

The impossible soon became a common toy!” Crazy brilliance most often comes when we have our noses to the wall and adversity baying at our back. It happened with Winston Churchill when he became prime minister of Britain during the Second World War; he was the man for the moment, he was able to navigate through crisis in ways he could not quite achieve in peacetime.

FW de Klerk did it in South Africa when the economy of the country he was president of began splintering under sanctions pressure. He did the unthinkable, he released Nelson Mandela and not only brought previously unimaginable prestige to a pariah nation, but also became a model of how to avoid war. Van Ness has had to find the resources adversity impels in small and large ways. He was booted out of home at the age of 17 by his Catholic parents for not going to church one Sunday.

Fortunately he had been working three jobs a day after school since he was 15: working in the stock room of a tool manufacturing company when he wasn’t going door-to-door as a Fuller brush salesman or working in the evenings at a drive-through mini-market. By the age of 18, he had already saved enough to make his first real estate investment! Looking back, he is sanguine, “Growing up, one of the basic values we learned was self-sufficiency.

As the sixth of eight children, I knew that if I wanted a car when I turned 16, I had to start saving from the age of 11.” But finding himself on the street was, not surprisingly, a life-defining moment; faced with adversity, Mark began scanning his environment. “I had a friend whose father was a property investor. I liked his lifestyle – one day I would see him taking golf clubs out of his car in the middle of day and another day he helped paint one of his buildings, whereas my dad worked very long days.”

And so Mark went into real estate and after a few years formed Sperry Van Ness with a colleague, whom he later bought out. The business grew rapidly, and today its 150 offices transact several billion dollars a year, but today’s success cloaks an important story of challenge, setbacks and a process where shared values helped create value. In 1990, three years after Sperry Van Ness was formed, Mark decided to enshrine company values in what he called a Core Covenant.

“Initially we didn’t need to write our values because we were living them every day. Then when we expanded outside our region I hired someone else to manage it; I noted after some months that it did not convey our company values. So I pulled together senior advisers, managers and staff and had them define the values of the organization.

Today, the Core Covenant enhances our culture of collaboration, attracts and retains people in the organization and also helps resolve disputes. It is the basis of our competitive advantage.” He believes that companies that lack active values “will go the way of the American car companies that ignored the quality management movement. This time it’s about social and environmental sustainability.”

And investor attention has shifted to it: “Oil and tobacco companies, as examples, may appear great investments but are really very risky. In 100 years, oil will not be our primary source of fuel. There is a trend now for investors to gravitate to renewable energy, as an example.” Real leaders can inspire businesses and NGOs alike to operate more financially sustainable operations.

For example, is it more worthy to donate food to people or to teach them how to plant and harvest crops? One enslaves societies into dependency, the other transforms and liberates. Real leaders, he says, are operating in a way that is wise and sustainable for people, planet and profits. But even that is not enough to weather economic storms; only ‘absurd’ ideas do that. Sperry Van Ness quintupled in size from 2001 to 2007. And then the storm clouds of the global financial crisis began gathering and Sperry Van Ness was struck by lightning. Volume in the industry dropped 80 percent in one year.

“The challenge was to restructure enough to be profitable, with only 20 percent of the volume. Two presidents insisted it was impossible. Finally I sat down with the executive team and a white board and said we need to start a new company, as if the old one went out of business.

“We started with a clean slate and the only member of the executive team to get the vision was promoted to president. Kevin Maggiacomo implemented the vision and restructured the company to be profitable at 10 percent of the previous volume and yet provide more value than before!” Yet again adversity presented a door, and Mark Van Ness saw it as an opportunity and had the courage to turn the handle.   axis   Mark suggests that the way to optimize the success of any individual or organization is to use a basic axis (pictured above). “Be on a path where you are moving toward the top right quadrant, where you are prospering by doing good for people and the planet. This is where life works with much less effort and the only place that is sustainable.

The (top left quadrant) traditional charity model has great intentions, but perpetuates dependency and is not financially sustainable. “Some (bottom right quadrant) are living in the old world that justifies short-term profit at any cost, and may be producing that which is unsustainable or profit while harming society, like tobacco. “Look at educational systems (bottom left quadrant) that are losing money and failing society; globally we are failing children with educational systems.

But what if we had video games that assisted with basic math, calculus or problem solving? In Los Angeles, ‘The Entertainment Capital of the World,’ there are more than 100 languages spoken in the failing school system. If the local entertainment talent was redirected from violence (to the top right quadrant), they could produce non-language based video games that are edutainment, done in a way that kids enjoy learning.

This could be transformative for education globally! “We are still trying to teach kids in conventional outdated ways. What if we transformed education from boring to fun and easy to learn?” Radical = transformative. The need to strike a better balance between people, planet and profit is everywhere, and it is compelled by population growth.

“Look at the population graph for the last 10,000 years, it is a vertical spike, but for the first time ever, populations have doubled in our lifetimes and will treble before we die. That’s another six billion people this one little island we call earth has to support. Imagine the impact of adding two more Chinas, two more North Americas, two more Indias, two more Europes all in your lifetime!

“Think of the earth as an organization that plods along with low growth for years and then suddenly triples in size; it puts tremendous pressures on employees, leaders and existing systems, which become ineffective under the added strain. That is what the human race is looking at; if we don’t rethink and restructure all our systems and way of leading with an eye toward long-term social, environmental and financial sustainability, we will go out of business as a species.”

 

0