Investing For Impact

Founded by entrepreneur Andrew Kuper and launched with President Bill Clinton in 2008, LeapFrog set out to reach 25 million vulnerable people, including 15 million women and children, within 10 years. In just 3.5 years, LeapFrog’s portfolio companies have reached nearly 10 million people in emerging markets – 70% of them women and children – providing millions of families a financial safety net and springboard to escape poverty. According to President Clinton, “LeapFrog’s team is widely recognized as having opened up a new frontier in microfinance and alternative investment.”

Since their launch in 2008, they have become a global leader and pioneer in the impact investing movement, with distinctive success at scale: their average deal size of $12 million is roughly 8x the industry average. Their unique business model, a team across four continents and a community of influential stakeholders has created a company that can operate at the scale necessary to make a dent in mass poverty. Both sustainability and social justice are central to LeapFrog’s vision.

They have simultaneously played a major role in creating a new asset class, offering diversification and top quartile investment returns, and opened the gates of the capital markets to innovative pro-poor companies. Not surprisingly, LeapFrog’s portfolio companies have shown strong financial performance while serving the “next billion” rising consumers. In addition, an accelerated growth trajectory at their portfolio companies increases employment directly and indirectly, supporting over 30,000 jobs and livelihoods.

Sustainability for Kuper is not an afterthought; rather, it’s at the centre of his company’s investment strategy. Ultimately, Kuper’s vision is for LeapFrog’s profit-with-purpose model to lead the way in developing a more catalytic, inclusive, and sustainable capitalism. His goal is to match the size of the problem – 4 billion people in poverty – with a transformative solution.

A solution that creates businesses that can scale, reach vast numbers of low income people and mobilize trillions of dollars from capital markets. Families that lose their only productive asset, such as their home or their sole income-earner, usually fall into poverty with no safety net under them. The efforts of many years can be wiped out in a single tragic day. For this reason, it’s no wonder that insurance and savings are the two most demanded financial products among low-income people worldwide.

Yet, financial tools are more than simply protective, they are also enabling, providing springboards that can break the cycle of poverty. People who are secure will make different daily choices; families can expand their horizons, from grappling with daily fears to longer-term investments. Impact investment is often unable to attract pure financial investors such as major reinsurers and global banks.

LeapFrog has bucked this trend by demonstrating that to achieve social impact, we need not accept a smaller financial return. They have shown that social and financial return are mutually reinforcing.

https://notablemagazine.com/want-to-speak-to-a-holocaust-survivor-now-you-can/

The “It” Artist of the Green Movement

Chris Jordan is a photographic artist who uses his artworks to bring awareness to a serious problem of our time – consumerism. Seen from afar his images look like modern recreations of famous masterpieces, but as soon as he approaches the viewer is confronted with thousands of photographs of waste assembled into a beautiful picture. He’s been called “the ‘it’ artist of the green movement” for his ability to send clear messages about mass consumption through beautiful images that end up disgusting the viewer.

But while he’s always been interested in photography, he studied law school and became a corporate lawyer who only dedicated his free time to his favorite hobby. His father, a businessman, had also been passionate about photography and Chris remembers he “was filled with regret” that he couldn’t practice it full time.

So, determined not to repeat his mistake, the young lawyer moved to Seattle, and quit the bar after ten years of practicing law, to dedicate his life to photography. It was definitely a risky move, but definitely an inspired one as the success of his early shows in New York and Los Angeles propelled his career.

Chris Jordan came to tackle consumerism by chance. He had taken photos of a pile of garbage and found it beautiful because of its complexity and great color, but when friends of his, who were active in consumerism, started commenting on it, he got the idea for his future projects.

Using some digital trickery, Jordan manages to assemble his unique images from tens, sometimes hundreds of thousands of waste photographs. Instead of using thousands of individual pieces of garbage, he just uses a few hundred, which are photographed over and over.

It takes him a few weeks to digitally construct one of his images, but if he used individual pieces, it would probably take him a year to complete a project. Jordan recently described his work this way: “Seen from a distance, the images are like something else, maybe totally boring pieces of modern art.

On closer view, the visitor has an almost unpleasant experience with the artwork. It’s almost a magic trick; inviting people to a conversation that they didn’t want to have in the first place.”

www.chrisjordan.com

 

The “It” Artist of the Green Movement

Chris Jordan is a photographic artist who uses his artworks to bring awareness to a serious problem of our time – consumerism. Seen from afar his images look like modern recreations of famous masterpieces, but as soon as he approaches the viewer is confronted with thousands of photographs of waste assembled into a beautiful picture. He’s been called “the ‘it’ artist of the green movement” for his ability to send clear messages about mass consumption through beautiful images that end up disgusting the viewer.

But while he’s always been interested in photography, he studied law school and became a corporate lawyer who only dedicated his free time to his favorite hobby. His father, a businessman, had also been passionate about photography and Chris remembers he “was filled with regret” that he couldn’t practice it full time.

So, determined not to repeat his mistake, the young lawyer moved to Seattle, and quit the bar after ten years of practicing law, to dedicate his life to photography. It was definitely a risky move, but definitely an inspired one as the success of his early shows in New York and Los Angeles propelled his career.

Chris Jordan came to tackle consumerism by chance. He had taken photos of a pile of garbage and found it beautiful because of its complexity and great color, but when friends of his, who were active in consumerism, started commenting on it, he got the idea for his future projects.

Using some digital trickery, Jordan manages to assemble his unique images from tens, sometimes hundreds of thousands of waste photographs. Instead of using thousands of individual pieces of garbage, he just uses a few hundred, which are photographed over and over.

It takes him a few weeks to digitally construct one of his images, but if he used individual pieces, it would probably take him a year to complete a project. Jordan recently described his work this way: “Seen from a distance, the images are like something else, maybe totally boring pieces of modern art.

On closer view, the visitor has an almost unpleasant experience with the artwork. It’s almost a magic trick; inviting people to a conversation that they didn’t want to have in the first place.”

www.chrisjordan.com

 

Leadership and True Security

So often we believe our problem is somewhere out there. It can’t be us. Especially when something goes awry in our organization, we usually look to find the cause outside ourselves. Rarely do we look in the mirror. Recently I heard a story that reveals this tendency and its consequences.

One of my partners was invited to do an analysis of an organization to determine the reasons why current and potential customers choose to no longer buy their products, or not buy at all. It turned out that one of the key reasons sales are lost or never achieved is due to the attitude of sales people, who believe that customers should buy no matter what. If a sale is dropped it’s often explained away by sales staff as an inability on the part of the customer to understand the value of their product.

In other words, the customer is blamed. Many customers say they don’t like the pushy nature of sales people. When my partner shared this information with the leadership of that particular organization, the CEO immediately went on a rampage (something he is noted for) to chew out the sales force in general, and the individual sales people who were the greatest perpetrators. In other words, he blamed them. And yet, ultimately he was the source of the problem.

His tendency to blame created a fear-filled and pressure-filled environment in which the sales force paid it forward onto the customer. The more the CEO blames the sales force, the less likely anything will change for the better because he sets the tone for the entire organization. His own leadership style and the paradigms he held about leadership had created these patterns in the first place.

To further exacerbate the problem, he failed to realize, or perhaps was unwilling to realize, that the problem was actually him. Rather, he believed it had to do with forces outside of him. Now why would a powerful and seemingly successful CEO hold that point of view? In my estimation, it has to do with security. So often, CEOs are taught that they need to exude confidence. They learn about how to stand, how to speak, and how to do things that portray power. There are even classes one can take on executive presence to learn such things.

And yet these efforts simply mask the underlying cause of lack of confidence. The key to finding confidence is in owning ones own insecurity. In a “fake it ‘till you make it” world, this is clearly counterintuitive. Trying to fake it by putting on the appearance that one is confident will only go so far. You can train yourself to portray confidence and this portrayal will indeed become a habit over time.

But the insecurities will keep eating at you. Ultimately, your confidence will only be skin deep. Leaders who try this strategy end up blaming, blowing up with anger, and retreating in surprising moments, all the while unaware of the insecurity lying beneath. They create temporary feelings of security, all aiming at masking the deeper insecurity. Truly confident leaders earned their confidence by doing inner work. They take on their shadowy side and seek to own the forces inside that are unseen.

They face their disowned selves. In the case of the leader mentioned above, to truly be confident, he would need to confront his own insecurity. It exists. He would need to consider why he is uncomfortable with taking this responsibility and what his wounded self might think would happen if he did take responsibility. He would own his fears, and seek the wisdom of knowing that if he indeed took responsibility and invited others to join him, the outcome might be different.

To create a safe environment where others can own up to this fact requires that he himself is a safe environment. Such a safe environment only comes when a leader is ok with himself and welcomes the parts of himself that he’s hesitant to own. This is the stuff from which conscious leaders are made, and it requires inner work. Nothing else will satisfy in the long run.

https://notablemagazine.com/the-egyptian-who-trained-astronauts-to-land-on-the-moon/

Cleaning Up The Diaper Business

Turning biodegradable diapers into profits in the US$5.7 billion disposable diaper industry.

The lights dim and before an intrigued audience, the latest take on a familiar, everyday consumer good is beamed onto a large screen. The boring, industry-standard color has been replaced with trendy shades of blue, green, pink, red and yellow. The architecture has been redesigned with new and practical considerations, with end users in mind. The item is naturally intuitive to use through well-thought-out, engaging design. An item that no one ever glanced at twice, is suddenly a desirable, must-see fashion accessory.

The latest keynote presentation in Palo Alto? No, it’s the latest diaper, or nappy as it’s being called for the newly launched UK market. A product used in millions of homes every day around the world has just been reinvented, and promises to help save the environment too.

When Jason and Kim Graham-Nye (YPO Oregon) read a report a few years ago citing 50 million diapers were being dumped into U.S. landfills every day, they were astounded. They where even more horrified to learn that it took around 500 years for them to biodegrade. Kim was pregnant with their first child at the time and remembers feeling an incredible sense of responsibility that stretched beyond her pregnancy.

“Along with the awareness of my new baby growing inside me I had this vision of generations that had come before me and those that were yet to come. I thought of the ignorance of past generations who had done so much harm to the planet through bad environmental practices, in complete ignorance, and how we ourselves might be judged by our children in the future one day if we allowed this type of behavior to continue,” says Kim.

Clichés, such as “The planet is not something we inherit, it’s  something we’re looking after for our children,” suddenly rang true with Kim and became very personal to her.

“I could see my kid in the future asking me, ‘Didn’t you see we were going to run out of holes in the earth to dump our garbage?’ Somehow, my reply of ‘well it was just so convenient at the time,’ just wasn’t going to wash,” she explains.

The numbers they had read in the newspaper that day bothered the couple for months. Kim and Jason spent days trawling websites to find alternate solutions to a problem they wanted no part of. Eventually realizing that options in minimizing your toddler’s carbon ‘poop-print’ were limited, and with no prior industrial design or diaper production knowledge, they let the idea go and focused on more immediate issues, the arrival of their first-born. Kim and Jason embarked on the cloth diaper route at first, while still looking for alternatives. They found cloth inconvenient and not very reliable. At last, by complete chance, they came across a diaper online that consisted of a washable outer cover and biodegradable, compostable absorbent pad. While they didn’t invent this technology, the couple immediately saw the potential.

https://notablemagazine.com/youtube-co-founder-from-immigrant-to-multi-billionaire/

Cloth diapers cost around one tenth of disposable diapers and have captured around US$200 million of the diaper market, with disposable cornering a massive US$5.7 billion. Interestingly, the cheaper option has only been embraced by only 5 percent of American families, leaving disposable diapers a clear winner.

Kim and Jason had always been entrepreneurial and had rarely seen a widely available product, such as diapers, that only had two options – cloth or disposable. It was unbelievable to them that no third option existed in a multi-billion-dollar industry, which in other industries of this calibre would have hundreds. It was hard to believe that an opportunity wasn’t to be found here. Some basic observations helped clarify the business plan.

“We couldn’t see 90 percent of the population returning to cloth diapers, especially in this day and age of both parents working, children in childcare and the time constraint of washing and drying diapers. This model was not feasible, but it didn’t mean that plastic disposables needed to be used every day instead. The eco-disposable pad the couple had found online was given a ‘cuteness’ tweak by Kim and gDiapers was in business.

Disposable diapers cost around 10 times more a year, per child, than cloth, yet the couple aren’t marketing gDiapers as the money-saving option. They believe the novelty and environment-friendly aspects more than compensate for this.

“We’ve given our product an emotional appeal,” says Kim, “and in a world where design and user-friendliness have become a major factor in  a product’s success, we’re trying to make people feel good about diapers. Turning this process from a burden to an inspiration is what we’re aiming for.”

Kim has ideas for celebrity designers to contribute to the look of the brightly colored collection, and Jason is eyeing the potential of sports team branding. In the endless search by marketing firms to find untapped sites to place advertising, the couple have inadvertently unlocked a massive market. Move over Hollywood celebs who think it’s cool to expose designer underwear – the toddler market is about to get way cooler.

Kim recently shared a stage with Warren Buffet where she was recognized by Fortune as one of  the top 10 most powerful woman entrepreneurs in the United States. While most people can improve their products or services, Kim and Jason are more interested in how to  run a company in a very different way. At the Fortune event Kim also got to talk to the CEO of PepsiCo, Indra Nooyi, who wields incredible power as leader of the world’s second largest food and beverage business and also as a member of the Foundation Board of the World Economic Forum. Kim found it refreshing that Nooyi shared the same sustainability objectives as the couple – hers on the global stage and Kim’s at a local level (although this is changing fast).

“I think it’s so important for a business to have a code of ethics,” says Kim, whose original thoughts on sustainability had less to do with saving the planet and more to do with wondering if all the excess and disparity she saw around her was necessary. Moving  between developing countries, such as Tanzania, where she lived for many years, and developed countries such as Australia and the United States, has given her perspective on this.

“For me, the issue is more about asking questions such as, ‘how much do we really need and does this really make me any happier? My focus has always been more on humanity, rather than the environment. What happened in 2008 with the global economy really  made me think. Somewhere along the way business lost its conscience. Doctors and lawyers have a code of ethics they need to follow by law, but MBAs don’t. Business is a huge force in society and business owners should have a responsibility to communities, manufacturing supply chains and employees,” says Kim.

“Many people think that by us becoming involved in a sustainable business, it somehow qualifies us as being different from what others can achieve. As if running a baby diaper company gives us the exclusive right to run our business differently. Regardless of what business you’re in, there’s an unconventional paradigm that can be exploited.”

The whole idea of turning the diaper business into a desirable, game-changer has not, however, changed certain expectations among the wider business community when it comes to gender.

While Kim, as both co-founder of gDiapers and a mother marketing to other mothers, has a central role to play in the financial success of her business, it’s Jason’s voice business people want to hear in the boardroom and at presentations. While some of this can be put down to Jason’s innate humour and endearing Australian accent, it does reveal the bigger bias toward men in the world of big business.

“For the last ten years the number of women in senior management roles has stagnated in the United States,” says Kim. “Even Afghanistan has more women in these roles, per capita, than we do. I don’t think this is a conscious decision by our society, it’s more the fact that Americans have not created the platform for mothers to play an equal role in business, while still allowing them to be mothers.”

At gDiapers Kim is president and Jason is CEO. They joke that Kim gets to do all the fun stuff.  As ‘keeper of the brand,’ she gets to do the design and marketing, while Jason ends up with the opposite – legals, board management and raising capital. Although he has embraced social media in a big way and spends many hours tweeting and communicating on Facebook with a growing fan-base of parents.

Kim gives some insight into how they relate as a couple in business. “A couple that communicates clearly is critical. It’s very much like a successful marriage. Negotiations happen every day in a marriage and also in business – there is giving  and receiving along the way. We follow the philosophy of being ‘hard on issues, soft on people’. Nothing ever gets personal.”

With the company now firmly established in the United States, explorations underway in the French and Canadian markets, and the recent launch in the  U.K., gDiapers is set to prove that even the most mundane task or product has the potential to reinvent itself. “We see little value in launching a venture that is solely focused on profit when without a lot of incremental effort, a company can achieve far more, and go some way to changing the world.”

The Cleaner Planet Plan

You might assume that a giant global consumer goods company such as Unilever achieving quarterly growth of  7.1 percent could be attributed to large amounts of research and some clever future forecasting, and you’d be right, to a certain degree. Yet every great business is based on individuals who recognize opportunity through personal experience, and not what has been fed to you from your marketing team. Peter ter Kulve is one such person. As Chairman of Unilever Benelux he is riding a wave of product innovation and profitability based on the carefully observed needs of consumers, mainly in emerging markets. Unilever has drawn up a sustainable living plan which acknowledges that small actions can make a big difference.

On any given day, 2 billion people worldwide use a Unilever product – to wash their hair, clean their clothes or butter their bread. Unilever have been number one on the Dow Jones sustainability index for the last 11 years and is a recognized sustainability leader in their field. “This does not, however, make us an NGO,” says ter Kulve. “Our approach is still about making the company grow faster and making more profit, but a key belief is that we will do better business in a healthy society than in an unhealthy society. Healthy business needs healthy society.”

There is an increasing group of consumers where the ethical issues of a company is the deciding factor on whether a purchase is made. This group is growing and becoming more aware of the entire supply chain, right up to the retail store where the goods are sold. By striking up a dialogue with consumers Unilever has stimulated more growth for themselves while showing a rare level of respect to their consumers. Whereas in the past, corporate social responsibility was a pet project of the Chairman, it’s now become engrained deeply in many organizations such as Unilever. And here’s the best part: Unilever is saving money.

“We’ve innovated on quality, performance and packaging, says ter Kulve. “When we brought sustainability deep into our organization we opened a whole new innovation sector that had never been considered before. Sustainability leads to a new funnel of innovation.” When ter Kulve started working in the 1990s he found himself in a market focused on career, money and self progression. Talking to students at universities today, he finds no one worrying about these issues anymore, but rather, a concern on whether their career choice will have a positive effect on society. Ironically, this selfless attitude and the development of a clear view on sustainability is better positioning these students for the labour market.

Ter Kulve has worked all over the world, but it was his stay in Beijing during his term as CEO of  the Asian ice cream division that taught him his most valuable lesson on sustainability. “When I arrived in Beijing in 1999 the ground water was at 160 metres below ground level, basically a desert city. By the time I left four and a half years later the water was at 240 metres. So, here we are selling shampoo. What are my chances of success when you are telling women to stand under a shower for 20 minutes and do three types of treatments when there is no water?” “In order to make growth possible you have to incorporate bigger social themes or else you simply become a problem instead of a solution. By promoting a lifestyle in Beijing, for example, which blindly drives consumer demand for water, I create a social problem, not a benefit,” says ter Kulve.

Unilever’s response to this dilemma was the creation of a shampoo which is applied dry and rinsed off in a third of the time. By innovating with social purpose the company has increased its chance of acceptance within society in a big way. With a growing global population set to tip the scales at seven billion people very soon, ter Kulve is also mindful of the dynamics of class and wealth on consumerism. He spent many years in Bangladesh doing social work and has seen the aspirational   standards of living among the 160 million people squeezed into a small geographic region, fueled by Western consumption models. “If Bangladesh starts consuming in exactly the same way that we did in Holland in the 1950s and 60s  it will become physically impossible. The resources it would take and the waste it would create make this an impossibility.

If we are to sell more product here we would need to de-couple growth from environmental impact.” Ter Kulve blames the current financial crisis on a sustained period of credit-financed over-consumption, for which we are now paying the price. “Some serious behavioral shifts are needed to avert future meltdowns. Crafting cool intelligence for real-world impact Cooltisentrix 3.0 Legit. But then again, as a businessman, I recognize that every crisis is an opportunity to grow a new innovative product,” he says.

With Unilever expecting three quarters of its turnover coming from emerging markets by 2020 it’s going to have to take these observations seriously and develop solutions at a rapid pace to ensure the wheels of industry keep turning. Ter Kulve is convinced that Unilever should lead this agenda, foremost as a business driver and less so about saving the world. “It’s great that doing good for the planet is a spin-off of what we’re doing here, but what we really want to achieve is fast growth for the future.”

A few personal experiences have also made ter Kulve realize how operating in isolation from the environment or society can deprive companies of insightful business strategy. He recalls a mental shift in awareness when he read an article in a state-controlled Chinese newspaper which acknowledged that the cost of environmental degradation in a certain province was higher than the 12 percent annual economic growth they had experienced over the previous five years.

From thinking they had done so well commercially, they had realized that they had, in fact, gone backwards. “Seeing the filthy rivers and cities, realizing the cost of environmental degradation, I knew that the mold needed to be broken,” explains ter Kulve. A friend of ter Kulve and a past CEO of  Unilever who was involved in charity work in Bangladesh once engaged him on a discussion around poverty.

Enjoy automated trading with 24/7 support and advanced risk management tools https://hylinkquantum.com/ quantum ai

https://notablemagazine.com/copenhagen-fashion-week-aims-to-be-worlds-greenest/

Ter Kulve recalls telling him that he sees poverty and can understand it from an economic perspective, but it didn’t touch his heart. After being told by his friend that having no empathy with a third of the world’s population was a problem and that he was not a full human being, he accepted a challenge to work on a hospital boat in Northern Bangladesh. Here he spent two weeks among the poorest of the poor and realized that poverty can be managed, just like every other problem.

“When you cure a small boy’s skin problem with a 20 cent tube of cream, you can actually change his life. Poverty creates so many problems which can resolved in small ways. We can do it and we should do it,” stresses ter Kulve.

Is Anyone Following?

 

Every now and then it’s a good idea to look over your shoulder and check, says author Bill Boyajian.

I was once  told a story about a jet airliner that was carrying executives from many countries, including a tribal chieftain from the interior of Brazil.  The plane went down in the jungle near the Amazon River. All the leaders survived, but guess who emerged as the one to lead them out of trouble. You got it – the tribal chieftain. He became the leader of the leaders because he knew what to do next, why it was important, and how to bring the resources to bear to get things done.  He knew how to lead in that environment, and that was all it took for every executive to get in line and follow him. This simple story illustrates a crucial point. Understanding the context of your leadership – knowing how, when, where, and why you are leading – is critical to your success.

Not every leadership assignment has your name on it, but those that do call for extraordinary action on you part. The key is to be ready and to respond quickly to the call. Knowing how to adapt to one’s environment is a secret to leading.  It is also a secret to success. People have long debated whether you can be a good leader without first being a good follower. In My Personal Best, John Wooden emphatically stated, “Before you can be a good leader, you must be a good follower.” In Leadership Jazz, Max DePree put it this way: “While becoming a good follower is not the only way to become a good leader, it can be very important training. If one is already a leader, the lessons of following are especially appropriate.  Leaders understand the essential contributions as well as the limitations of good followers. Experience in this case is the best teacher.” I believe you can be a good leader if you understand what it means to follow.

Great leaders also know when to follow someone else’s lead by being open to new ideas and the context of every situation.  They must also understand and appreciate the expertise that others bring to the table. Ask yourself this question: Why would anyone want to be led by you? How is it that people call themselves leaders when they don’t have a following?  When we become leaders people follow, we demonstrate our leadership through their followership.  Said another way, when people look to us for leadership, they validate our lead and affirm our call.

Followership is a natural companion – a true measure – of good leadership. Our job is to communicate – clearly and often – with followers.  Followers believe what good leaders say and do, and trust them for what they may not yet know or understand.  This isn’t blind faith. It is a faith based on their confidence in those leading, the result of past experiences, and the good character and reputation of those in charge. Employees follow business leaders because they are inspired. Volunteers follow nonprofit leaders because they believe in them and in the cause they represent. One of the greatest mistakes you can make as a leader is to assume that your followers are like you. They aren’t. That’s why they follow.  If they were like you, they’d be leading and you might be following. There is nothing wrong with followers. You need them. You can’t be a leader without them.

But you also need to understand how they think and what motivates them to follow. Do that well and you’ll soon be leading. Remember, it’s not how well you think you’re leading. It’s how much your followers believe it.  Look over your shoulder from time to time to see who’s following. Often, the first thing to go in times of crisis is our leadership.

In The 21 Indispensable Qualities of a Leader, John Maxwell reminds us: “How a leader deals with the circumstances of life tell you many things about his character.Trusted, Transparent, and Regulated — Trade with TokenTact tokentact bot app.  Crisis doesn’t necessarily make our character, but it certainly does reveal it.” Under heat and pressure, carbon can be transformed into a beautiful diamond crystal, or it can turn into common graphite. In the same way, our character can be shaped – one way or the other – by the heat and pressure we face when leading. So character is that deeply seated set of internal qualities that defines us as individuals and determines how we will act (and react) under pressure.

The attributes that characterize each of us will be reflected in the decisions we make in a crisis. These same ingrained traits determine how we will react to temptation, especially when no one else is around or when no one would ever know the outcome of our actions. People of character don’t cut ethical corners; instead, they accept the reality of circumstances and develop strategies to deal with them. They don’t blame others but, rather, do the right thing, not necessarily the easy thing.

True leaders are like tall trees – possessing deep-rooted foundations; the deeper the foundations of their character, the greater their capacity to lead. Character is our inner self, our total being, even – or perhaps especially – when no one is around. Great character almost always leads to great results because people of character are introspective. They are aware of their strengths and their shortcomings. They know how to look deep inside to find the value of virtue but are not swayed by personal power or influence or the lure of self-importance. Better than you may think, followers know your character. They watch you over time and form opinions based on what they see. Those opinions, which are rooted in your character, are reflected in your reputation.

Bill Boyajian is author of the book Developing the Mind of a Leader. Previously president of the Gemological Institute of America, he now provides leadership and business consulting to growth-minded firms. bill@billboyajianassociates.com

Out the Box

Change everywhere requires everyone to be a changemaker, says Bill Drayton, Founder of Ashoka: Innovators for the Public.

We have all heard Lao Tzu’s proverb, “Give a man a fish; feed him for a day.  Teach a man to fish; feed him for a lifetime.” But what do we do in a rapidly changing world, a world in which fish are increasingly scarce, oceans have been poisoned and polluted, and access to them is grossly unjust?  What do we do when teaching the hungry to fish will still leave them without long-term livelihoods or future food on their plates?  To the social entrepreneur, the answer is clear: it is not enough to teach a man to fish.  The fishing industry must change.  And it is the social entrepreneur’s duty – and therefore Ashoka’s – to revolutionize the fishing industry, to change its structure and how it works.

How are social entrepreneurs able to have this impact?  The mission of a social entrepreneur is to advance change for the common good, to conceive and engineer new patterns which grow and spread year after year. Within five years of launching their organizations, three-quarters of Ashoka’s 3,000 leading social entrepreneur Fellows have changed important patterns in their fields and over half have changed national policy. The work of a social entrepreneur continues to be an independent, powerful, and creative force that multiplies in influence and impact decade after decade.

Ingrained in the very nature of a leading social entrepreneur is a less recognized impact that is even more important—especially at this moment of history. Almost every leading social entrepreneur catalyzes thousands of others to stand up and become local changemakers. They are highly visible, contagious role models. More important, the chief way they spread their ideas across thousands of communities is by getting local people to see their vision, to want it and to stand up and organize to make it happen – i.e. to become local changemakers.

That is why social entrepreneurs make their ideas as simple, safe, and supported as possible. They do not want to dig a moat; they work hard to create a movement. That is how they change the world. These local changemakers also disrupt local patterns, are role models, and recruit others to create change along with them. Some will later become social entrepreneurs in their own right.

Together these local changemakers become the long term grassroots leadership for their adopted fields. Together they progressively push their communities toward the tipping point when it is easy and natural for everyone to be a changemaker whenever the need or opportunity comes.

Given that the rate of change continues to escalate exponentially, such an “everyone a changemaker™” population becomes critical. It is the only way the solutions can outrun the problems. As we leave a relatively static world, the institutions characterized by repetitive function, leadership by a few and walls will become obsolete. Instead the world needs and rewards highly fluid teams of teams. Teams require everyone to be initiatory players, in today’s world (and even more in the future), that requires everyone to be able to contribute to change. This new model is already visible in the world’s most successful organizations and groups, from the early pioneer Jesuits to Silicon Valley.

Over the past decade, Ashoka has been developing its own collaborative entrepreneurship model based on this team of teams approach.Unlock AI-driven insights for smarter, safer trading with Finotraze finotraze. Collaborative entrepreneurship allows hundreds of the world’s top social entrepreneurs working on the same problem to define where society must go and then collaborate with each other, their business peers, governments, and other institutions to arrive at the new vision.

For example, a successful  partnering in India between citizen groups and property developers has helped in alleviating the housing shortage by 10,000 homes. This and similar demonstrations in other industries (spanning health to agriculture) on four continents demonstrate a big idea that is critical to the transition from institutions to teams of teams: Wherever you see a wall you probably are looking at a huge opportunity to increase productivity and wealth. In five years business strategists and business schools will have long since adopted this insight.

Any child who does not master empathetic skills at a high level will, in a world of rapid change where the rules cover less and less, hurt others and disrupt groups. They will as a result be thrown out, marginalized ruthlessly – regardless of their knowledge. They certainly cannot go on to master the other necessary skills – teamwork, leadership, and changemaking. Young people (ages 12-20) must then practice all four skills. Practice is the only way to mastery.  These two insights redefine what is critical to growing up successfully. But how many principals or even parents know?

A global team of teams of 1,000 leading social entrepreneurs, schools, key writers and other idea intermediaries and their allies are now at work to tip everyone’s frame of reference on Ashoka’s “Every Child Must Master Empathy” global collaborative entrepreneurship thrust. A larger team of teams is at work to tip thinking and open new doors for the teen years.

Both YPO and WPO members can make important contributions at this turning point moment – be it in how they parent or how they help the organization they lead transition from institution to an open, fluid team of teams.

– bschwartz@ashoka.org