Empowerment Through Change and Perseverance

Step into the shoes of an Ecuadorian women living in a small community in the Andes Mountains. It’s a Wednesday and wake up call is at 4:00 am. The sun is still a bit drowsy; the Earth and the people slowly arise for the day’s activities. With a family of growling stomachs your responsibility as a mother requires you to prepare breakfast. You’ll have to make whatever is in the house…whatever you could afford with your limited five dollars at the market yesterday. Perhaps there is some rice (1 pound is 0.50 cents), pastries (1 dollar buys you 10) or mangoes (1 dollar buys you 25) left over.

The clock is ticking; only 30 minutes left before you must go out to attend to your duties. With no time to spare, you head out into the field to tend the farm. Today’s job includes washing your donkey, feeding the sheep and collecting food for the guinea pig and rabbits. Yesterday you were watering crops, digging the buried potatoes and cutting weeds. You must allocate proper time for both the animals and agriculture. Poor time management equates to an empty pantry, no school uniforms (meaning no education), and no extra money for repairs around the house, for example.

Your back is in pain due to constant hovering and lifting in the field. Complaining might help the emotional side, but it won’t alter the physical. In fact, it won’t change the fact that tomorrow you will need to suffer the same physical challenges in order to bring health, education, clothes and shelter to your family. You’re willing to do anything for your loved ones. You grew up knowing that life can be hard; your ancestors told you that those who work the hardest are the ones that live the longest.

The sky has gotten dark and the evening chill is flowing. Dinner sounds nice, if money allows. Water would be great too, if one of your children went on a 5-8 hour walk to fetch it. A shower? Forget about that because you’ve had your shower for the week on Monday. It’s nine in the evening. You look at your successes and after a full day, the monetary gain is maybe 0.50 cents. Less than one dollar. It’s clear now that in your “free time,” before heading to bed, you need to knit a scarf for the women’s group. Someone needs t0 bring in the alternative income.

Not a second in the day goes by that your hands aren’t busy. Money means hard work and hard work means food. Your bed calls, ready for tomorrow starting at 4 am. Sleep, work, work, work, and repeat. During one of my Giveable Giggles trips to Ecuador in 2013 I met numerous women who live the daily experience described above. This, however, is the modern experience. Not too long along the communities and women, in general, lived in circumstances of extreme inequalities, violence or discrimination. One person in particular, Maria Angela Pacheco explained to us that she refused to go on living in these circumstances. She is living proof of how one’s goals combined with determination, passion, mobilization and action can make a difference.

As a young girl she grew up combatting the consequences of poverty, racism and sexism. She was raised in an environment in which women were treated and viewed as inferior and unequal. In comparison to the men of the community, there was a complete lack of opportunities for women. Perhaps it is because the culture called for the females to concentrate on domestic work, which inevitably created a barrier to the outside world. The household became a place for male domination despite it being a “women’s territory.” The men – husbands, politicians, brothers — made all of the decisions about how the women in the village lived their life.

Concerns relating to marriage, occupation and education were among some of the matters that were stripped from a women’s authority. Unsurprisingly, when a woman began to take control of her life, marriage or occupation, violence was expected. Avoiding the horrors of abuse the ladies, consequently, were silenced by the men. Once I understood this context, it began to make sense why the females I met were overwhelmingly shy. Who would want to speak out when their voice was cue for psychological or physical aggression? The women were shut out of opportunities to express their voice and opinions.

Maria Angela did not accept this reality. When she finished high school, she was disgusted with the overwhelming inequality. She took the initiative to listen to her fellow community members. Lost voices were suddenly heard. She essentially broke down the household barrier and welcomed females to speak out for what they believe in. As Maria Angela powerfully stood up for what she believed in, equality was given and respect earned. When she was 18 years old she became the first female president of her community. Following her leadership role and changing times, the community and surrounding areas have dramatically evolved. A woman’s space is no longer limited to the domestic realm. Their voices are no longer locked up in their own minds. Being a female no longer means extreme inequality or opportunities.

Through Maria Angela’s leadership and encouragement, she has introduced a number of microenterprises, for instance. She focuses on knitting projects with younger girls because it provides greater opportunities for their future and the development of the community as a whole. A young generation of educated, confident and powerful women is better equipped to succeed and start a chain reaction in modeling equality. Now even if the ladies had a tough day in the field, they have a safe place and group of like-minded women to interact with. Perhaps the past few day’s earnings were below the necessity; the profit from their group will serve as an alternative to maintain stable families. Maria Angelo has completely transformed the social structure, organization, politics, economy and institutions in these Ecuadorian communities.

When I went to visit Maria Angela, I realized that it has taken a long time for these communities to get to where they are today. Maria Angela did not wake up one day and find a suitable village in which to eradicate inequality overnight. I look towards her clarity, dedication and leadership to explain this transformation. In fact I found out that she ran leadership, ‘rights’ and self-esteem workshops to raise awareness within these communities.

In other words, she made a conscious effort to change a deeply embedded social norm of inequality to encourage positive progress. Maria Angela taught day after day, in place after place until she was able to recognize change. I would venture to believe that many of us resonate with Maria Angela. Perhaps in terms of the struggles we face as people (e.g., due to gender, religion, race or nationality) or as leaders (e.g. time, financial obstacles or space).

Often times I must remind myself that change is an ongoing process and that it may take time to reach our goals. Perseverance was key for Maria Angela. It is her dedication to seeing a change that generated a high impact. It is absolutely incredible that with the willingness to do what it takes to accomplish a goal many lives can be impacted for the better.

Maria Angelo can now measure her success based on the new laws passed, the many successful microenterprise women groups and an environment of equality. She proves that one person can make a difference.

How To Disrupt the Tech World

What is your image of an inventor or innovator? A man alone in a lab? Increasing evidence shows most innovation comes from two or more people… one of whom might even be a woman! We stereotype innovators as men and mainly in STEM* products. A quick quiz – who invented the following: the circular saw, COBOL and the compiler, the windshield wiper, Kevlar and a radial keyboard for the paralyzed? [Answers at the end of the post]

Three years ago, Whitney Johnson asked me how I felt as the only female partner in my VC firm. I’d never thought about it before. I never felt any discrimination or lack of respect from my partners. From how I was raised through my education and my career at Bell Labs and AT&T, I never felt any gender bias. Maybe it was there and I was just insensitive.  I investigated – looked, listened and learned…and realized it was still an issue in the 21st century! In June 2013, Vivek Wadhwa and Farai Chideya invited women to crowd-create a book on women innovators by sharing their own stories. I submitted one (Chpt 3, Disrupting My Way Through Life). Fast-forward ~ Innovating Women launches today!

Vivek and Farai have curated a collection of personal, powerful, inspiring, encouraging, disruptive, and challenging stories of women who grabbed the status quo by the horns. The stories are from and about women from all over the world, in STEM, investing, non-profits and STEAM. The stories, including one by America’s new CTO and former VP at Google[X] Megan Smith, are the authentic voices of women who have persevered, overcome, created, and innovated their careers and accomplishments. This book is full with lessons for women, men, girls, boys, teachers, leaders, managers, even politicians on how to overcome stereotypes, stigmas, and artificial distinctions.

These lessons are being applied today and barriers are breaking down. Freshman Engineers designing radial keyboard for the communication impaired (e.g., ALS)I am privileged to see changes first-hand.  Last April, I helped at the Assistive Tech Makeathon for students to create communication solutions for people who can’t communicate (like ALS). The rapid design-prototyping-iterating process resulted in several potential hardware and software products.

Three freshman women engineers won the software award for an easy, attractive and quick radial keyboard! Get Innovating Women. Read it, share it, discover, encourage and empower women and girls to create more stories so we can unleash the talent needed to solve the wicked problems facing our world.  Keep the stories coming! *STEM: Science, Technology, Engineering and Math; STEAM = STEM + [Art + Design] Inventors:

How To Inspire Young Social Entrepreneurs

Besides a lot of creative energy, young people bring valuable skills to the table – particularly digital and social networking capabilities. This can be great boon to any growing enterprise. But only a small proportion of high school students around the world have access to entrepreneurship education, let alone education in social entrepreneurship. When young people finish school, they should be more aware of entrepreneurship as a career opportunity and they should know what steps to take if they want to start a business.

Private-public partnerships that provide for interaction between schools and the business community may be instrumental in closing the gap between a traditional academic curriculum and the skillset necessary to launch a successful start-up. Social Innovation Relay (SIR), a global initiative run by international educational organization Junior Achievement, challenges high school students to develop innovative business concepts that address social needs. Student teams from all over the world are paired with corporate volunteers from Hewlett Packard who act as mentors and help teams turn their concepts into viable business projects.

A jury selects the three best concepts – those that stand a real chance of becoming profitable ventures in their respective communities. In 2014 a group of four secondary school students from Kenya developed the winning concept, an affordable mosquito trap to reduce the incidence of malaria in the country. Such mentorship programs have a proven positive impact on participants and their motivation to start real social enterprises in the future.

According to Warwick University’s Centre for Education and Industry, which evaluated the impact of the Social Innovation Relay in 2013, 78 percent of participating students are now more confident of their ability to start a social enterprise, 86 percent are more aware of what social issues exist in their own community and 84 percent are more aware that social and business objectives can be complementary. At least ninety percent improved their communication, motivation, critical thinking and teamwork skills.

Drawing on the four-year experience of running the Social Innovation Relay, we have identified the most important factors that maximize the impact of this kind of initiative:

  • Draw young people’s attention to real problems in their communities, because these are things they know and care about. This motivates them to learn and apply their skills.
  • Ensure access to corporate mentors from large companies who are knowledgeable about business, management and marketing techniques necessary to get a social enterprise off the ground.
  • Maximize the wow factor for young people by using IT in interesting ways.
  • Most of young people participating in the program are social media and IT savvy, but they need more coaching to help them apply those social media skills to their business projects.

It is not enough just to help young people identify unmet needs in their communities and develop business plans. Access to funding is a crucial issue for all entrepreneurs, and an even greater issue for social entrepreneurs from developing countries. To address this problem, Junior Achievement partnered with the Singapore-based Pwee Foundation, which connects private investors and social entrepreneurs.

The Foundation is evaluating the best business ideas put forward by this year’s students to determine whether they will be able to attract investors and receive necessary funding. In the meantime, the shortlisted social innovation teams continue receiving mentorship and business coaching from the Pwee Foundation during the evaluation stage.

The working model of the SIR can be duplicated. The biggest challenges are scaling up the initiative and attracting more corporate volunteers to maximize its reach. These challenges can best be addressed by raising awareness of the positive impact of such programs on young people’s entrepreneurial potential, and their relatively low implementation costs. Programs such as SIR do not require educational system reforms or additional government spending.

Yet they are proven tools to spur social innovation among youth and equip them with a skillset that can help them make a difference in their communities.

Caroline Jenner is CEO of Junior Achievement – Young Enterprise Europe

Why Welcoming Immigrants Advances Social Progress And Prosperity

With the recent launch of the Social Progress Index, the Skoll Foundation and other leading institutions have introduced a fresh lens through which to measure our advancement as a society and as nations. The Index provides a snapshot of countries’ progress across nearly 60 indicators, going beyond traditional measures like GDP to look at measures like access to knowledge and inclusion. It might come as a surprise to some that “tolerance of immigrants” was among these leading indicators of social progress.

After all, with so many portrayals of immigrants in the media as dangerous threats, why would Skoll and others have chosen to prioritize their receptivity and welcome? The answer lies in a simple metaphor that speaks to why migration is increasingly being recognized as a force for positive development by the UN and other global institutions.

Imagine if your favorite sports team had a terrific player who was constantly placed on the bench. Wouldn’t that frustrate you? From Einstein to Sergei Brin of Google, immigrants have always been important players in American History. They are particularly likely to start a business, file a patent, take risks, and think outside the box.

When communities fail to create a welcoming environment for their immigrant populations, they are in essence benching one of their most valuable players. But increasingly, communities across the country are realizing the benefits that immigrants can bring, and they are stepping up to the plate to welcome their immigrant residents.

Earlier this year, Michigan Governor Snyder made waves with his announcement of a new visa program to lure immigrants to Detroit, prompting a healthy discussion on the role of municipal government in attracting and retaining immigrants.  The extraordinary population loss experienced by cities like Detroit and others throughout the American rustbelt have made these cities the epicenter of discussions on how immigrants can play a healthy role in community revitalization.

While Snyder’s specific proposal may be a newer approach here in the US, the broader idea that an immigrant welcome strategy should be an essential component of economic development has already taken hold in cities across the U.S., bolstered by growing evidence that such strategies create a competitive advantage for communities and lead to positive growth and prosperity for all residents.

The efforts among these early adopters to capitalize on their diversity advantage and welcome newcomers is just the tip of the iceberg.  In fact, communities across the U.S. and around the world are already competing in a “race to the top” to attract the human capital – at all levels of the skills spectrum – that they need to thrive in a globalized economy.

As a resulttoday nearly one in ten Americans live in a community whose local government has committed to advancing an immigrant-friendly agenda.  Last year, my organization, Welcoming America, launched an initiative calledWelcoming Cities and Counties that offers local governments the opportunity to commit publicly to advancing a welcoming culture and policy agenda. 30 municipal governments representing regions with a total population of over 28 million have already joined, and range from cities with a long tradition of welcoming newcomers – such as the cities of San Francisco and New York – to newer gateways, like Boise, Idaho and Charlotte, North Carolina.

Consider St. Louis, Missouri.  After a local economic impact study found that St. Louis was missing out on a key ingredient for economic development – immigrants – the business, public and nonprofit sectors came together to work to make St. Louis the fast growing U.S. metropolitan area for immigrants by 2020.

Likewise, Dayton, Ohio developed a comprehensive welcoming plan that includes a range of program and policy recommendations that support more inclusive institutions and also strengthen ties between newcomers and more established U.S. born communities. In these communities and in others, plans have been created – and are being implemented – with the active participation of leaders from virtually every sector of the community.

African American leaders in particular have been important partners in Dayton and other communities, recognizing the opportunity to increase the tax base, expand economic opportunity, and start a community-wide conversation about how their cities can become more welcoming and inclusive to all of their residents.

As Baltimore’s African American mayor, Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, discussed on National Public Radio, “We’ve actively recruited Latino immigrants to Baltimore, and when they come here, they’re thriving. Many have opened businesses, employed individuals… People who understand a growth strategy understand that I’m not choosing immigrants over native-born Americans or that I’m choosing new residents over current residents. It’s about all of us growing and getting better and being successful together, it’s not an either-or proposition.

Cities like Nashville, Tennessee are among those that have already seen the competitive advantage of a more proactive strategy to ensure immigrants are fully welcomed.  Six years ago, after a dramatic demographic shift in which many longtime residents felt unsettled by the growing immigrant population, local backlash spread and the city was poised to become the largest in the country to pass an English-only ordinance that would have not only devastated its immigrant population, but also would have hurt Nashville’s national reputation as a welcoming city for tourists, and driven out new entrepreneurs and homeowners, costing taxpayers millions.

Fortunately, local leaders – including myself – worked to build bridges between U.S. born residents and newcomers and ultimately persuaded Nashvillians to reject the referendum and embrace a more welcoming ethos. This effort proved to be a turning point, followed by a range of new welcoming policies and programs, shepherded by Mayor Karl Dean.

Set on a new course, Nashville was able to position itself as a global city, attract and retain international investment and talent, and create a flourishing cultural scene that celebrates both the old and the new. Thanks in large part to its “global positioning,” Nashville led the country in job growth in 2012 and attracted significant corporate investment and entrepreneurial startups. The city’s growing economic strength illustrates how a welcoming culture creates benefits that are enjoyed by the community as a whole.

Just a few years ago, cities in Alabama and Arizona were racing to the bottom with policies that sought to drive out their immigrant populations – with disastrous consequences.  Today, cities across the country are racing to the top, to welcome newer immigrants while also ensuring that U.S. born residents are part of the conversation around their changing communities and the shared opportunities that demographic change can bring.

As the debate over comprehensive immigration reform continues, leaders in Washington should pay heed to this growing movement of innovative municipal efforts and the growing recognition of the economic imperatives for welcoming and inclusive policy.  The challenge is out to all cities – and we hope many more will continue to win in this race and to position themselves for success and positive development.

David Lubell is the founder of Welcoming America and has been Executive Director since October of 2009. David is former Executive Director and founder of the Tennessee Immigrant and Refugee Rights Coalition (TIRRC). TIRRC is now considered a model for emerging immigrant’s rights coalitions forming across the U.S., and was named “Advocacy Affiliate of the Year” in 2008 by the National Council of La Raza (NCLR), the largest Latino civil rights organization in the U.S. While at TIRRC, David helped found Welcoming Tennessee, the model for all subsequent Welcoming projects. Before TIRRC, David was Advocacy and Organizing Director of Latino Memphis, a non-profit in Memphis, where he helped lead a successful organizing campaign to increase access to healthcare for Memphis’ growing LEP (Limited English Proficient) population.

Women Hold Up Half The Sky! (but occupy less than a quarter of MBA seats)

Twenty percent of the current Oxford Executive MBA class are female – a figure pretty much in line with many leading business schools but one which falls short of the parity to which most schools aspire. The reasons for women’s lower MBA participation rates are much discussed, as are mechanisms to address it, but the gap remains unbridged, and the need for diversity in the upper ranks of organisations is more pressing than ever.

‘Awareness of the opportunities business schools offer women is a critical part of the story’ says Kathy Harvey, Director of the Oxford Executive MBA. ‘Business schools  are not getting the MBA message across sufficiently clearly to high potential women in business, and I am therefore delighted to partner with the 30% Club to raise awareness of the benefits of a business education for aspiring women leaders. An MBA can create a bridge to the kind of boardroom performance which should be within the grasp of many high potential women managers, and not enough of them are taking advantage of this opportunity.

That’s something I’m determined to change. As a well-regarded and high profile organisation which works persistently to advance the representation of women in senior roles in business, the 30% Club’s endorsement of the Oxford EMBA, and their commitment to spreading the word about the benefits of an MBA for female executives, will do much to help us attract the talented female candidates we are seeking.’

The benefits to organisations of having women in senior roles are well documented. There is a powerful intuitive argument for having a varied board and executive team, with complementary skills and less danger of ‘groupthink’. Institutional investors are increasingly considering overall board effectiveness including diversity as an important aspect of good governance.

Helena Morrissey CBE, CEO of Newton Investment Management and Founder of the 30% Club said: ‘The 30% Club is delighted to partner with Saїd Business School on this Scholarship. Tackling the lack of female talent progressing to senior levels in industry is something that needs a continuum of efforts – and not just within companies but at all levels of education. Having such a prestigious business school tackle this head on is key to long term change being achieved.’

A growing body of research shows that women excel in precisely the traits necessary to address the challenges currently facing many large organisations – providing key inputs to enhance corporate performance. ‘Skills such as corporate diplomacy and greater competency around global risk are ever more important. All the more reason why women – and their organisations – should be considering how an MBA can boost their performance and accelerate their careers’ says Kathy Harvey.

‘Many of our female alumni have achieved great things as senior executives in large corporates or as entrepreneurs leading their own companies. But the continuing low numbers of women in leadership positions globally indicates that companies and individuals have still not found a way to utilise the skills and insights which women can offer. We hope that by working closely with the 30% Club, we can break through to women, and their employers, around the world, and convince them of the benefits of investing in their business education.

It is not enough to exhort women to “lean in”. Women need access to the knowledge, insights, resources, networks and mentoring which world-class business schools like Oxford are well placed to provide. At Oxford, women have an opportunity to argue their case, debate future solutions to some of the world’s most complex problems, and to emerge confident in their ability to make difficult judgements.

An Executive MBA, which allows participants to combine study with a demanding job, is also an opportunity to reflect on leadership style and to build a professional and personal development plan to manage career acceleration up to board level. Through this scholarship we hope to attract some of the best candidates for senior leadership positions globally.’

How Women Will Save Us All

Female executives have never imagined life would get easier for them, but lingering financial uncertainty across our ever more interconnected markets may just provide the last little push they need to get ahead–if they dare to. A longstanding argument against women in power has been that men have done just fine without them.

They’ve been running businesses, countries and social institutions quite happily and profitably forever. Even in industries whose primary customers are women, men have been holding the reins with no intention of including beardless pretty faces in strategic planning and leadership. Well, leading just got a whole lot tougher, didn’t it, boys? The longest and most globally contagious financial crisis in most of a century is showing that men alone aren’t as effective as they thought they were. The inevitable question is already being asked in a femininely hushed and tactful manner: Could this have been avoided if women had been involved in financial leadership?

As every good coach knows, when you ask a difficult question, people get no rest until it’s answered. Many are discussing how regulation can help avoid another bubble of speculation and stud-like risk assumption in the future, but the best protection may be right in front of us: gender-balanced teams at the top. This is not so much about forcing quotas as it is about admitting that men and women have very different approaches to the same challenges, particularly when it comes to risk taking. Faced with the absolute same decision, most men will shoot from the hip, relatively speaking, while most women will stand still and ask for more information. Sound familiar?

A quick look at our history as a species provides endless examples of men’s preference for risk and women’s love of security. Gender task specialization in mammal packs over millions of years was the best way to guarantee survival and evolution. Males risked their lives to bring food home, while females protected settlements from surrounding threats. And when they didn’t agree on how to act, they were forced to meet each other halfway.

The development of agriculture drastically changed humankind. Secured food supplies made larger settlements possible and, more important, allowed humans to build walls against predators, environmental threats and competing tribes. Life got a lot less uncertain. Relieved of the burden of nomadic living, men and women slowly began the battle of the sexes. They were no longer forced to quickly agree where to move to or what to hunt to keep the tribe alive one more day.

Many thousands of years later, globalization and instant connectivity across the globe have swept leaders back to levels of uncertainty and survival threat that remind us of our uneasy beginnings. In the world of business, no money today means no tomorrow. Rather than killing ourselves deciding how many legal filters and hoops to create for bankers to jump through, maybe all we need to do is make sure a lot more women have a say in what operations are approved and why.

By bringing men and women back into close-knit teams at the very top of organizational hierarchies, we may very well get the multinational giants that run our lives today to begin to respond in a more responsible and sustainable manner. Knowing what to do, however, doesn’t mean it’s going to be easy to do it. Boardrooms and top executive teams have been designed by men for men for a very, very long time.

Even as human resources policies work to push women up the ladder, many reports today confirm that the gender gap remains: Men earn more and rise faster across countries and industries. Here again, policy makers are faced with an impossible intellectual challenge: How many rules and filters? How do we enforce them? Why is it so difficult to get women up to the top? And yes, once again, the answer stands before us: Women are different from men.

Articulating equal opportunities for different genders is an oxymoron. Getting to the top requires mastering the unwritten rules of leadership models in any organization, a collective body of unconscious reflexes and individual choices that H.R. policy makers have absolutely no access to. That’s why no amount of quotas and policies can solve the problem. Women are simply going to have to learn to play the game of power the way men do. At least for now.

Once women get to the top in sufficient numbers to actually influence corporate strategy, unwritten rules about what someone has to do to be promoted in the organizational pack will naturally evolve to include female preferences too. So stop complaining and get playing. If leading the world were easy, both you and I would be unemployed.

The original article appeared on Forbes.com

 

Gender Intelligence: Integrating Masculine and Feminine

Many traditions have as a model, the power of the integration of the masculine and feminine. In the Chinese tradition, Yin and Yang (feminine and masculine) are seen as forces that when brought together, become a natural whole. In the Hindu tradition, Shakti is the goddess of the feminine and Shiva the god of the masculine. They come together to form a unified whole – different sides of the same coin, often depicted in images side by side.

Carl Jung spoke of the power of the masculine and feminine and even holds that the soul of a man is feminine (Anima) and the soul of a woman is masculine (Animus), suggesting that to become whole, one is required to embody the opposite. Each wisdom tradition, throughout the ages, values this integration, the coming together, the unification of the masculine and feminine, and suggests that if we are too far in either end of the polarity, something in us gets disconnected. If we move too far toward the masculine, we often do damage, are over aggressive, and don’t listen. Our expression becomes dominant, excessive and rigid. We become over controlling.

If we move too far toward the feminine, we have no movement. We have no direction, drive or force. We become tentative and too yielding.

More often than not we equate the masculine polarity with men, and the feminine polarity with women however both genders have the potential to embody both polarities at any given moment, in both healthy and unhealthy ways. Every man and every woman carries a certain combination of these energies within.

In leadership, a healthy masculine and a healthy feminine are both needed. A healthy masculine embodies enough of the feminine such that it can express the beauty or upsides of the masculine. The masculine is the impulse of change, evolution and freedom. It is constantly looking for movement and to achieve something meaningful. It can be firm without being rigid; provide direction without blinders, and be direct and clear without being closed.

A healthy feminine embodies enough of the masculine such that it can manifest its beauty. The feminine feels at home in a relational context and in fact grows through inclusion and connection. It is deeply anchored in the web of life and creates and gives structure and substance. Intuition is a spontaneous emergence of this energy. It can be open without being flaccid, yielding without acquiescing, and fluid and flowing with enough intention as to facilitate transformation. Both a healthy masculine and a healthy feminine are crucial to effective leadership and can come in many forms and expressions. Whatever the form or manner, together they embody the best of leadership.

As leaders, if we can expand our capacity in the masculine and feminine, where we can play with and express both, our ability to consciously lead and choose our response in different situations is expanded.

If I am not able to move within these polarities inside, when I meet one or the other in the outside world, I will feel more challenged and contracted in relating to it. As I look at the arc of human history in business and organizational life, it appears we have overly emphasized the value of the masculine. We have bowed at the alter of the masculine in business to the point that it has become our own undoing. However it must also be acknowledged the masculine force and its expression in leadership has worked well, and in fact, has contributed a great deal to our advancement as a society.

The drive to create, innovate, grow, develop, reach new heights, and compete for the betterment of the system, are deep expressions of the masculine polarity. We have created extraordinary outcomes and results from that masculine drive. Unfortunately, despite the positive effects of this force, there are two significant downsides. First there is a tendency for the masculine to dominate the environment for its own desires. As a result, our environment is showing clear signs of suffering.

It is no accident we call our planet, Mother Earth, and she is in pain. We are driving forward without considering the severe consequences, without a sense of connection to her. This is a reflection of the masculine gone awry. The second downside is that the masculine is highly linear and operates much better when the variables are known, consistent and manageable. To the extent that the world is highly changing, ever fluid, and highly unpredictable, the masculine is limited in its ability. A more feminine force is needed to partner with the masculine drive in order to navigate in an ever changing dynamic.

Fluidity and the ability to dynamically steer are now far more important than holding tight to five year strategic plans, no matter what reality is showing us.

Far more than ever before, a style of leadership combining a healthy masculine and feminine is needed to navigate our way through this continuously evolving world.

Progress and movement, including mindfulness about the larger picture, considering multiple perspectives, and decision-making with awareness are crucial to organizational success. Companies that understand this and have a blend of men and woman in senior positions, animating the healthy aspects of the masculine and feminine polarities, have broken their own glass ceiling, and are much better at producing results.

As chronicled in my recent book, Gender Intelligence 1, coauthored with Barbara Annis, through more balanced leadership, decisions tend to be more aligned with sustainable results, creating better cultures, that are more responsive to their markets, and utilize their talent more effectively.

All this adds up to greater profitability and performance. So take a look around your organization. Do you see a healthy balance of the masculine and feminine? How do these polarities arise in you, as a leader? Do you have some agility in expressing and valuing both the masculine and feminine poles? Are you taking advantage of the full depth and breadth of your talent pool by welcoming and utilizing the natural differences between the masculine and the feminine? Or are you holding on tightly to an imbalanced masculine model of leadership that is rapidly becoming a dying breed in today’s highly volatile and ever changing environment?

1 Annis, B. and Merron, K., Gender Intelligence: Breakthrough Strategies for Increasing Diversity and Improving Your Bottom Line, Harper Collins, 2014.

 

The Only Way for Women to Win

Something terrible is happening to women who work. I deal with it constantly because I coach men and women executives who work in large corporations. It gives me a front row seat that allows me to closely look at what really works for women to rise in leadership and influence and still like their lives. 

I can tell you one thing, the worst advice women get is to act like a man. 

And that’s exactly the advice they’re getting. “Lean In” Author Sheryl Sandberg has recruited Condoleezza Rice, Anna Maria Chavez (the CEO of Girl Scouts, pictured above, right) to encourage girls everywhere to be more assertive. You know, speak up! Push your point of view! And, “Man-up!” They have started a campaign called “ban bossy” to tell girls the lie that the reason society is cheating women out of their fair share of leadership opportunities and money is because they’re not aggressive enough.

Using anecdotes out of their own life stories they claim that assertive behavior in boys marks them as leaders while the same behavior labels a girl as being to bossy. So their solution is to make bossy the N-word for younger generations. Then girls could be assertive and become the leaders they desire to be. This is simply colossally crazy.

When I am called on to help an executive in trouble it is most often because they are too assertive.

Leaders whose primary quality is their assertiveness are known as jerks or worse. Nobody likes a bossy know-it-all whether you’re a man or a woman. In fact in today’s flat organization the most important asset a leader can have is the social intelligence to build collaborative work-teams to implement a stream of innovations. Leaders who try to do this by telling people what to do and using their power to take charge end up killing creativity, innovation and commitment necessary to succeed in today’s hyper-competitive world.

No, raising girls to be bossy women is not the answer to the lack of leadership opportunity that women have.

Yet it’s not surprising that smart people continue to make this error about the root cause of women getting a raw deal at work. A review of human history leads to a truly awful conclusion… Women have always been exploited by men. I don’t mean that all men are bad, abusive or even unkind. I’m just stating the obvious.

Human institutions, laws and culture have virtually always over-favored men at the expense of women.

A little history… Less than 100 years ago women did not have the right to vote! In most countries they didn’t have the right to own property or a legal right to raise their own children. Sexual assault was not considered a real crime. (It still isn’t in many countries.) Until 50 years ago there were few women professionals. Doctors, lawyers, architects, accountants and women were universally discouraged from pursuing careers.

The cultural effect was that women were almost solely dependent on men for their economic security which made them put up with a lot of stuff that they should have never put up with. In the 1960s we couldn’t pass an equal rights amendment so we got feminism. Now I don’t want to antagonize any feminists I just want you to consider how men have twisted feminism to make the world better for them rather than women.

While it’s true women got to enter the workplace, for the most part it wasn’t for good jobs. Today two-thirds of people who are in the minimum wage are women. And women still only make 75% of what men make for doing the same work. In management it’s even worse… women earn only 68% of what the same male managers do. (Source: Catalyst.org) And in 2013 we could not even get Congress to pass an equal pay law… I know, it’s insane!

So what’s the world men have created by manipulating the ideals of feminism?

Survey show that women are suffering the health effects of record-high sustained stress because they are the primary child raisers, house cleaners and family managers even when they have full-time jobs. And this is in families where a husband is present. We also have a record number of single mothers who teeter on the edge of economic disaster because of rampant job insecurity while they try to raise happy, healthy, well-adjusted children.

And by the way, most men are just fine with this. Men have worked hard to create their unique twist on equality. For instance, single men rarely go out on dates, instead they just have meet-ups which enables them to meet potential sexual partners with the least amount of effort and commitment. They typically also require women to pay their own way and frequently find ways to wheedle women into paying for everything.

Research reveals that the male creative executives who control our diet of entertainment via movies, TV and music have created social norms that make women who do not make themselves sexually available at the very beginning of a potential relationship seem prudish or hung up.

But most of all, men love it when they can get women to do their work.

In most of the large organizations I consult with women make up the majority of the management ranks but not at the level of senior leadership.  Just like at home, male business leaders rely on women to make everything work but give them very little real power. And even the women CEOs I’ve consulted with are dominated by their male boards and testosterone-crazed Wall Street analysts who soon turn them into women who have to behave like men to succeed.

I know these results aren’t what feminists had in mind but it just seems to me that many of the real gains that women have fought for in political, economic and social equality have been distorted by male-dominated institutions that are awesome at doing one thing… furthering men’s self-interest.

And now we have the perfect spokesperson for male domination. Her name is Sheryl Sandberg. You probably know her as the billionaire COO of Facebook and the author of her horrifically, stupid best-selling book, Lean In. Her book and message has been summed up by many as… if you want to get ahead in the world act like a man, lead like a man… just quit making excuses, acting like a victim or being shy about what you want. Take your place at the big table, be prepared, be confident, and above all be assertive. A few other things. Work hard.

If your work requires travel, grit your teeth and go. Be sure to marry well and insist your husband does an equal share of the household work and child-raising. Get home by six every night, have family dinner, then get on your conference calls and kick some ass. If that sounds like good advice to you perhaps you, like Sheryl are a billionaire executive who graduated from Yale, have friends in the White House and have several nannies to cover for you.

And just look at what Sheryl Sandberg does. She makes sure that Facebook makes money so that CEO Mark Zuckerberg gets richer and can spend his days playing around with big ideas.

Let me point something out to you.

Creating a new generation of highly driven selfless women dedicated to making our businesses and institutions work is a man’s dream. Most powerful men would rather sit on Boards of Directors so we don’t have to do the real work. I just don’t see men giving up their power to women simply because they’re capable executives. The man’s need to be in charge is virtually limitless. On the other hand getting women to do their work… now that is very attractive. If you think I’m kidding consider General Motors.

They shocked the world by choosing Mary Barra to be the first female CEO to lead a car company. Awesome right? Well, you tell me. Her total compensation is less than 50% of the compensation of the man she replaced. He, by the way, will continue to serve GM as an “outside advisor” still making more pay than she does! It’s just another example of men getting women to do their work without paying them. Do women really want to be leaders so badly they will accept any terms pushed on them by men?

Well enough about the problem… how ‘bout a solution?

After doing a lot of thinking I believe the only real answer is to start a parallel economy. One driven by women-led enterprises. These companies need to operate on the useful disciplines of the old economy but incorporate the uniquely vital abilities of women to trounce their gray-beard competition. Please understand by women-led I don’t mean women only enterprises. It’s already proven that the most successful organizations integrate the strengths of both men and women in ways that reduce their individual weaknesses. But for this to become common place we need a lot more women entrepreneurs and CEOs.

The reason this is so important is that I believe that only radical change can create a future of sustainable abundance. All attempts to reform the old economy have failed.

But women can use the rules of the Old Boys Club to bring it down. They can out-compete them, out-innovate them and they can create work-lives that embody happiness as well as success. And they can turn capitalism into the engine for civilization.

I will tell you HOW you can do something to ignite this change right now in part 2 of this blog coming next week. I hope you’re curious.

Also don’t be shy about commenting on my unconventional views… am I out to lunch about how men exploit women? Is the ‘system’ rigged against them? Is Sheryl Sandberg right… women would be better off behaving like men? Thoughts?

 

Tyra Banks, Harvard Educated Venture Capitalist?

A serious businesswoman lurks beneath the former supermodel, who has launched a venture capital firm and wants to teach girls how to fiercely pursue their ambitions.

If you thought all models were only into their looks and had selfish, unlikeable personalities, think again. Television personality, actress and supermodel Tyra Banks has adopted a no nonsense approach to promote and empower women in business. Under the slogan “Fierce, Fearless, Flawsome,” Banks established the TZone in 1999, a leadership development program for girls, and more recently, venture capital company Fierce Capital LLC, that has a preference for funding start-ups that are predominantly female-led or focused.

The word “flawsome,” coined by Banks, is a combination of  you + your flaws + awesome = flawsome.” She explained the concept was tied to her years on America’s Next Top Model where she and producer Ken Mok cast over 70 percent of participants. Debate raged about what constituted beauty and Banks came up with the word as a way of expanding the concept of what beauty means. “Perfect is boring,” says Banks. “Flaws are awesome.”

Banks is a vocal critic of fashion magazines that show models who appear to have eating disorders. She saw models backstage, during her modeling days, who abused their bodies to maintain a certain weight and feed into commonly held ideals of what perfection and beauty was. In her early 20’s Banks was given a list of designers who no longer wanted to book her for shows because of her growing curves. Realizing she would need to deprive herself of nutrition to continue working, she broke down in tears.

Her mother’s solution saved the day, “’Eat pizza,’ she told me. We went to a tiny pizzeria in Milan together and strategized how to turn my curves into a curveball,” Banks recalls. “In a way, it was my decision not to starve myself that turned me into a supermodel, and later on, a businesswomen.”

She warns girls not to fall prey to thinspirational images of beauty and mothers to be careful about how they talk about their bodies in front of their daughters. With her parents divorced at the age of six, and having had her fair share of abusive relationships, Banks has first-hand experience of the self-esteem building that many young girls need. “The pre-teen and teen years are the most complex developmental years in a contemporary girl’s life,” says Bank’s.

“It’s terrifying, turbulent, and terrific… all at once. A girl’s body, family, friends, schools and community are all demanding growth and change.” For many inner-city girls living in poverty, low self-esteem, disengagement from school, pervasive community violence, risky behaviors and sexual experimentation contribute to a trip down a slippery personal slope. “As a young girl growing up, people are going to tell you, ‘no, you can’t,’ all the time.

You have to have tunnel vision and know that you want it, that you’re going to do it, through sacrifice, sacrifice, sacrifice. Saying, ‘ooh I want that’ – magic wand – is not going to happen.”

The Tzone, situated in the Lower Eastside of New York, inspires the hundreds of girls who attend to believe in themselves and to take control of their futures. The girls-only club encourages the awareness of the accomplishments of outstanding women, as a way of showing what’s possible.

Banks also wanted the Tzone to become an actual space that girls could come to instead of just another grant-making foundation that gives out money. The $20 million project is funded through fundraising initiatives, the City of New York and a yearly Flawsome Ball, which sees celebrities and sponsors raise nearly $1 million per event. Some of the activities at the Tzone include community activism, dance, filmmaking, leadership, sports, writing or financial literacy initiatives that will help create young entrepreneurs.

Originally started as a series of summer camp, Tzone’s is designed to reinforce positive values and encourage girls to resist social pressures through a fierce, self-esteem building adventure. Banks uses the word “fierce” a lot in her branding, although she balances it frequently with another of her crazy words, “smize” – smiling with your eyes. Her journey from supermodel to super-mogul has been a personal one, in which she has identified closely with her target market, rather than seeing them as another charitable tax break.

“I launched this venture with my own money,” says Banks. “ I feel I have a responsibility to lead by example and bring attention to the issues facing young women. I want them to take positive action to realize their ambitions.” Banks enrolled in a three-year Owner/President Management Program (OPM) at Harvard, graduating in 2012, and has been prolific in establishing new business ventures ever since, all with a slant towards empowering women.

Despite the shallowness found within much of the fashion and beauty industry, Banks is showing that it can evolve beyond this. She’s acutely aware of her celebrity status and knows she cannot allow it to become an overriding factor in her work at Tzone. “What I don’t want to be is Tyra, the ‘celebrity girl,’ coming here and the girls being excited when they see me,” says Banks. “I want them to be numb to me.

I can do normal work here and they can see me, to know that this is what a business is. It’s not about living on a red carpet. I am a businesswoman who goes to work every single day.”
 To fund her social ventures Banks established Fierce Capital, the investment arm of The Tyra Banks Company, of which she is both CEO and Chairman. Its aim is to help raise capital and develop profitable business strategies.

One of her early investments was in The Hunt, a community-driven online shopping experience, that will track down coveted items seen in social media photos and let you know where to buy them. The fun and innovative approach to shopping allows women to help other women find their perfect outfit.

Since its launch The Hunt has surged to one million unique monthly visitors, attracting hundreds of thousands of people who are drawn to this new approach to collective retail and styling. Through Fierce Capital, Banks is leveraging her unique background of 20 years as a leader in fashion, beauty and entertainment. And rather than moving away from her previous career as a model, she is using all she learnt to develop innovative products and businesses, for the ultimate benefit of women’s empowerment.

Fierce Capitals latest investment in Android application Locket, in November this year, had the CEO and Co-founder, Yunha Kim, reinforced this when she said, “As a female founder, I am excited to be able to lean on another female entrepreneur for advice and deep media expertise.”

Banks supports businesses through brand alignment and by giving financial support that entrepreneurs might otherwise find difficult to procure through traditional venture capital channels.

The successful businesses that she takes on will have the opportunity to leverage Bank’s social and traditional media sphere of influence, as well as tap into The Tyra Banks Company’s extensive network to build significant business relationships.

Banks does not see her business units in isolation, but rather as complimentary structures that might even give rise to new business ideas. In an age jaded with countless combinations of private investment meeting fashion, it’s impressive, and extremely rare to see a fashion model, leading a capital group with Harvard certificate in hand. While Banks is desperate for the young girls in her care to find women to look up to in society, she has inadvertently become their greatest role model.

“I’m encouraging girls to be leaders, not followers; in control, not out of control; powerful, not powerless,” she says.

Social Entrepreneurship: Myths, Advice, and the Future

Last month, social entrepreneur Jessica Jackleg (pictured above) joined a Google Hangout hosted by Upstart, a platform allowing entrepreneurs to monetize their future potential. Jessica, who might be best known as Cofounder and CMO of Kiva, is currently an advisor at the Collaborative Fund, which invests in creative entrepreneurs changing the world though emerging technologies.

Prior to joining the Collaborative Fund, Jessica cofounded and held the position of CEO of ProFounder, a pioneering crowdfunding platform providing tools for entrepreneurs in the U.S.. Despite several serious technical glitches, Jessica shared her introduction to the concept of social entrepreneurship and answered questions from Upstart and the Hangout participants.

Very early in the Hangout, Jessica dispelled the common myth that to be a social entrepreneur, you must be a martyr. She stressed it is possible to create positive social change and be paid what you’re worth. Additionally, when it comes to considering a social entrepreneurial career, it is important to consider the value of being able to do something that you love and are passionate about.

Jessica shared that when it comes to organizational structures, she is agnostic. Instead, she believes entrepreneurs should answer, “What do you want to get in the world?” Then, “What’s the most efficient way to do that?” And, “What’s the fastest way to access capital?” Then determine the right organizational structure. In some cases, the most efficient way to affect change is by creating a not-for-profit and sometimes it’s not.

What’s really important is diving in, having in-person experiences with the people you want to serve, and then finding the most effective way to do it. When asked what advice she has for young social entrepreneurs looking to gain leadership experience, Jessica explained that she encourages young people to be confident in your knowledge and skills, but balance it with humility and a desire to constantly learn.

She also encouraged young leaders to seek out coaches and mentors. To wrap up the Hangout, Jessica shared her thoughts on the future of social entrepreneurship. She strongly believes it “won’t be anything unusual” and people will pursue it as naturally as people currently pursue other entrepreneurial ventures.

She also predicts the blurring between “social entrepreneur” and “entrepreneur” as people come to expect companies to automatically consider their social and environmental impacts. Dovetailing with that, the role of social entrepreneurs within established corporations, or “social intrapreneurs,” will become increasingly more important. You can watch a recording of the Hangout here.

What do you think about the “social entrepreneur martyr” myth? Are you organizational structure agnostic? What advice would you give to young social entrepreneurs seeking leadership experience? Please share your thoughts below!

0